2023
DOI: 10.1101/2023.05.19.23290257
|View full text |Cite
Preprint
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Race, Sex and Age Disparities in the Performance of ECG Deep Learning Models Predicting Heart Failure

Abstract: Background Deep learning models may combat widening racial disparities in heart failure outcomes through early identification of individuals at high risk. However, demographic biases in the performance of these models have not been well studied. Methods This retrospective analysis used 12-lead ECGs taken between 2008 - 2018 from 290,252 patients referred for standard clinical indications to Stanford Hospital. The primary model was a convolutional neural network model trained to predict incident heart failure w… Show more

Help me understand this report
View published versions

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
1

Citation Types

0
1
0

Year Published

2024
2024
2025
2025

Publication Types

Select...
1
1

Relationship

1
1

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 2 publications
(1 citation statement)
references
References 38 publications
0
1
0
Order By: Relevance
“…While highly performant, deep learning has several key limitations. Domain shifts, which are difficult to track in complex distributions such as waveforms and can occur such as when a model is applied at a new hospital 15 , population 16,17 , or imaging vendor 18 , can degrade model performance significantly. Spurious correlations can allow the model to "cheat" without learning clinically salient features, for example by detecting the presence of a pacemaker or laterality marker in a chest x-ray 19,20 or a surgical skin marking in a dermatology image 21 , leading to unintended shifts in performance during deployment.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…While highly performant, deep learning has several key limitations. Domain shifts, which are difficult to track in complex distributions such as waveforms and can occur such as when a model is applied at a new hospital 15 , population 16,17 , or imaging vendor 18 , can degrade model performance significantly. Spurious correlations can allow the model to "cheat" without learning clinically salient features, for example by detecting the presence of a pacemaker or laterality marker in a chest x-ray 19,20 or a surgical skin marking in a dermatology image 21 , leading to unintended shifts in performance during deployment.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%