2001
DOI: 10.1016/s1090-9524(02)00032-3
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Race talk: the perpetuation of racism through private discourse

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2
1
1
1

Citation Types

1
61
0

Year Published

2007
2007
2022
2022

Publication Types

Select...
6
4

Relationship

0
10

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 74 publications
(64 citation statements)
references
References 15 publications
1
61
0
Order By: Relevance
“…The first uses critical discourse analysis to reveal closeted racism. This is the project of Teun van Dijk (1992), implemented by, among others, Bell and Hartmann (2007), Bonilla-Silva (1997, 2006, Myers and Williamson (2001) and Zamudio and Rios (2006), which aims to study discourse and to show how hesitations, contradictions, inconsistencies and nervous laughs are evidence of inner racism. Discourse analysis allows us 'to delve beneath the surface of initial answers to reach the deep structure and cultural commonsense' (Bell and Hartmann 2007, 898).…”
Section: Racism As a Category Of Practicementioning
confidence: 99%
“…The first uses critical discourse analysis to reveal closeted racism. This is the project of Teun van Dijk (1992), implemented by, among others, Bell and Hartmann (2007), Bonilla-Silva (1997, 2006, Myers and Williamson (2001) and Zamudio and Rios (2006), which aims to study discourse and to show how hesitations, contradictions, inconsistencies and nervous laughs are evidence of inner racism. Discourse analysis allows us 'to delve beneath the surface of initial answers to reach the deep structure and cultural commonsense' (Bell and Hartmann 2007, 898).…”
Section: Racism As a Category Of Practicementioning
confidence: 99%
“…According to some researchers (Benokraitis and Feagin 1995;Bonilla-Silva and Forman 2000;McDermott 2006;Myers and Williamson 2001), one of the biggest problems with survey research, especially in regard to ultra-sensitive topics, such as race, class, gender, and sexuality, is its validity and reliability in the measurement of respondents' attitudes. That is, in today's society where it is often socially unacceptable to disclose personal prejudices, people are more likely to lie about and hide their illiberalities from public scrutiny.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Bonilla-Silva (2003) argues that when minimization is combined with cultural racism, the results are ideologically deadly (Bonilla-Silva 2003, 40), rendering the possibility of 'race cognizance' (Frankenberg 1997) near impossible. Myers and Williamson (2001) conducted participant observation to examine everyday discourse, defining 'race talk' as 'any talk that demeans on the basis of race or ethnicity' (Myers and Williamson 2001, 4). Their use of the term differs from that of Bonilla-Silva and Forman (2000) who define it as discursive attempts to mitigate a potentially racist view.…”
Section: Previous Studies Of Race Discourse and Whitenessmentioning
confidence: 99%