2020
DOI: 10.1016/j.jss.2020.07.008
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Racial and Socioeconomic Disparities After Surgical Resection for Rectal Cancer

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2
1
1
1

Citation Types

1
16
0

Year Published

2021
2021
2024
2024

Publication Types

Select...
7

Relationship

0
7

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 17 publications
(17 citation statements)
references
References 35 publications
1
16
0
Order By: Relevance
“…Previous researchers have attempted to assess how SDH may be linked to access to care or, in some instances, higher quality care such as high-volume hospitals or designated cancer centers. [34][35][36][37][38] The majority of these studies have, however, considered only patient-level factors to include factors that characterize the communities in which patients live and have not considered how hospital community-level factors may play a role in the quality of care delivered to patients. As such, by combining both patientlevel SVI and hospital-level REI, this study utilized a novel approach to examine how SDH might be associated with postoperative outcomes after pancreatectomy.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
See 1 more Smart Citation
“…Previous researchers have attempted to assess how SDH may be linked to access to care or, in some instances, higher quality care such as high-volume hospitals or designated cancer centers. [34][35][36][37][38] The majority of these studies have, however, considered only patient-level factors to include factors that characterize the communities in which patients live and have not considered how hospital community-level factors may play a role in the quality of care delivered to patients. As such, by combining both patientlevel SVI and hospital-level REI, this study utilized a novel approach to examine how SDH might be associated with postoperative outcomes after pancreatectomy.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Part of these efforts has focused on the identification of factors associated with variations in postoperative outcomes, including race/ethnicity, sex, age, and surrogates for SES. Previous researchers have attempted to assess how SDH may be linked to access to care or, in some instances, higher quality care such as high-volume hospitals or designated cancer centers 34–38 . The majority of these studies have, however, considered only patient-level factors to include factors that characterize the communities in which patients live and have not considered how hospital community-level factors may play a role in the quality of care delivered to patients.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Insurance status remains a critically important factor in disease outcomes as poor insurance status has been shown to be independently associated with lower overall and disease-specific survival, lower rates of minimally invasive surgery, and greater rates of postoperative complications. 1,23 Insurance status has been posited to be a partial mediator of the racial disparities in colorectal cancer diagnosis and treatment among Black patients, particularly due to the finding that Black patients are more likely to be uninsured or underinsured compared to White patients. 24 There are systemic issues that have led in part to this disparity; for example, Black patients and other minorities in general are underrepresented in high-paying jobs that provide health insurance in a benefits package.…”
Section: Insurance and Socioeconomic Statusmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…For colorectal cancer, access to high-volume hospitals have been associated with improved outcomes, including decreased length of stay, lower hospital charges, and decreased postoperative complications. 1,23 However, Black patients are more often treated at lower volume centers, which translates to surgery by lower volume surgeons and higher mortality rates. [44][45][46] Interestingly, this decreased utilization of high-volume centers is not related to physical proximity or distance traveled.…”
Section: Surgical Barriersmentioning
confidence: 99%
See 1 more Smart Citation