2016
DOI: 10.1007/s40615-016-0262-8
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Racial Differences in Bone Microarchitecture and Estimated Strength at the Distal Radius and Distal Tibia in Older Adolescent Girls: a Cross-Sectional Study

Abstract: Background Previous studies have demonstrated that an individual’s race and ethnicity are important determinants of their areal bone mineral density (aBMD), assessed by dual-energy x-ray absorptiometry. However, there are few data assessing the impact of race on bone microarchitecture and strength estimates, particularly in older adolescent girls and young adults. We hypothesized that bone microarchitecture and strength estimates would be superior in Blacks compared to White and Asian American adolescent girls… Show more

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
5

Citation Types

0
16
0

Year Published

2017
2017
2020
2020

Publication Types

Select...
4
1

Relationship

1
4

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 15 publications
(16 citation statements)
references
References 52 publications
0
16
0
Order By: Relevance
“…Furthermore, peripheral quantitative computed tomography data indicate that black and Hispanic children have 10% to 37% greater estimated bone strength of the tibia and radius than white children, attributable to greater cortical bone density (2% to 5%) and bone area (7% to 18%) in Hispanic and black children compared with white children . Studies using high‐resolution peripheral computed tomography also confirm more favorable bone microarchitecture at the peripheral skeleton in adolescent black and Asian individuals compared with non‐Hispanic whites . Altogether, these patterns of racial and ethnic variations in BMD, bone microarchitecture, and bone strength that begin in childhood and track into adulthood likely contribute to race and ethnic differences in stress fracture risk found in the current study of US Army Soldiers.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 83%
See 3 more Smart Citations
“…Furthermore, peripheral quantitative computed tomography data indicate that black and Hispanic children have 10% to 37% greater estimated bone strength of the tibia and radius than white children, attributable to greater cortical bone density (2% to 5%) and bone area (7% to 18%) in Hispanic and black children compared with white children . Studies using high‐resolution peripheral computed tomography also confirm more favorable bone microarchitecture at the peripheral skeleton in adolescent black and Asian individuals compared with non‐Hispanic whites . Altogether, these patterns of racial and ethnic variations in BMD, bone microarchitecture, and bone strength that begin in childhood and track into adulthood likely contribute to race and ethnic differences in stress fracture risk found in the current study of US Army Soldiers.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 83%
“…Low areal bone mineral density (aBMD), tibial trabecular volumetric BMD (vBMD), and cortical area are associated with increased stress fracture risk among military personnel . Consistent with their lower risk of stress fracture, studies have routinely demonstrated higher BMD and more favorable bone microarchitecture among black individuals . For example, the National Health and Nutrition Examination Study (NHANES) reported that in older adults, non‐Hispanic blacks have the highest BMD values, non‐Hispanic whites the lowest BMD values, and Mexican Americans have BMD values between those of non‐Hispanic blacks and non‐Hispanic whites .…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
See 2 more Smart Citations
“…Increased Gα S stimulates bone turnover in favor of bone formation; however, this also drastically reduces bone quality. As levels of Gα S in the human population are known to vary, they may contribute to currently unexplained variation in bone microarchitecture, mineral density, and strength . The HOM‐G S mice will allow us to assess the effects of catabolic and anabolic stimuli in the presence of increased Gα S and assess potential avenues for therapeutic intervention.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%