“…Clearly, by excluding 21% of the current workforce, employers would be routinely overlooking highly skilled and talented labor, which would likely limit long-term productivity and success, similar to systematic discrimination in all hiring practices. 14,[28][29][30] Further, a large cost that we are unable to capture in this analysis is the cost of employee turnover. Prior studies indicate that this cost is substantial and consists not only of advertising dollars, but also lost productivity (and potentially quality) resulting from the time spent by (a) others in searching for and training a replacement, conducting exit interviews, and so on; (b) the departing employee in preparing to leave; (c) the new employee in getting comfortable with required tasks in a new setting; and (d ) miscellaneous costs, including severance pay, certifications, uniforms, and so on.…”