2020
DOI: 10.1016/j.socec.2020.101512
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Racial discrimination in the lab: Evidence of statistical and taste-based discrimination

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2
1

Citation Types

0
3
0

Year Published

2022
2022
2024
2024

Publication Types

Select...
4
2

Relationship

0
6

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 13 publications
(3 citation statements)
references
References 30 publications
0
3
0
Order By: Relevance
“…First were firms to replace all people who use substances or have an SUD; they would be excluding or replacing 21% of the current workforce according to our weighted estimate. Clearly, by excluding 21% of the current workforce, employers would be routinely overlooking highly skilled and talented labor, which would likely limit long-term productivity and success, similar to systematic discrimination in all hiring practices 14,28–30 . Further, a large cost that we are unable to capture in this analysis is the cost of employee turnover.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 97%
See 1 more Smart Citation
“…First were firms to replace all people who use substances or have an SUD; they would be excluding or replacing 21% of the current workforce according to our weighted estimate. Clearly, by excluding 21% of the current workforce, employers would be routinely overlooking highly skilled and talented labor, which would likely limit long-term productivity and success, similar to systematic discrimination in all hiring practices 14,28–30 . Further, a large cost that we are unable to capture in this analysis is the cost of employee turnover.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 97%
“…Clearly, by excluding 21% of the current workforce, employers would be routinely overlooking highly skilled and talented labor, which would likely limit long-term productivity and success, similar to systematic discrimination in all hiring practices. 14,[28][29][30] Further, a large cost that we are unable to capture in this analysis is the cost of employee turnover. Prior studies indicate that this cost is substantial and consists not only of advertising dollars, but also lost productivity (and potentially quality) resulting from the time spent by (a) others in searching for and training a replacement, conducting exit interviews, and so on; (b) the departing employee in preparing to leave; (c) the new employee in getting comfortable with required tasks in a new setting; and (d ) miscellaneous costs, including severance pay, certifications, uniforms, and so on.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…This type of discrimination may be reduced by providing better information about the unobserved characteristics of other users. This more accurate and more specific information decreases the informativeness of more diffuse demographic information and may therefore reduce the reliance on this information (Resnick et al, 2000;Robbins, 2017;Wozniak & MacNeill, 2020) Users may also have other reasons to include demographic information when assessing others.…”
Section: Literature Review: Trust and Discrimination In Online Marketsmentioning
confidence: 99%