2022
DOI: 10.1016/j.jsat.2021.108691
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Racial disparities in linkage to care among patients with substance use disorders

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
3
2

Citation Types

1
8
0

Year Published

2022
2022
2024
2024

Publication Types

Select...
6

Relationship

0
6

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 8 publications
(9 citation statements)
references
References 16 publications
1
8
0
Order By: Relevance
“…The lack of association in the present study may be due to our smaller sample size relative and differences in sampling design (e.g., clinical data extracted from a single ED located in Maryland vs. nationally representative sampling frames) ( Amaducci et al, 2020 ; Martin et al, 2021 ). Prior data observing racial disparities among Black patients referred to treatment by peer specialists was similar to the present study in terms of overall sample size, but the present study had a somewhat higher percentage of Black patients (32% vs. 21%) and the characteristics of the sample (e.g., geographic region) or intervention strategy may differ in ways that are not captured by the present analysis ( Webb et al, 2021 ). We are not able to examine outcomes as a function of individual peer specialist or specialist-patient concordance with respect to racial and gender identity, however, we note that the peer specialist staff at JHBMC was diverse with respect to race and gender.…”
Section: Discussionsupporting
confidence: 73%
See 3 more Smart Citations
“…The lack of association in the present study may be due to our smaller sample size relative and differences in sampling design (e.g., clinical data extracted from a single ED located in Maryland vs. nationally representative sampling frames) ( Amaducci et al, 2020 ; Martin et al, 2021 ). Prior data observing racial disparities among Black patients referred to treatment by peer specialists was similar to the present study in terms of overall sample size, but the present study had a somewhat higher percentage of Black patients (32% vs. 21%) and the characteristics of the sample (e.g., geographic region) or intervention strategy may differ in ways that are not captured by the present analysis ( Webb et al, 2021 ). We are not able to examine outcomes as a function of individual peer specialist or specialist-patient concordance with respect to racial and gender identity, however, we note that the peer specialist staff at JHBMC was diverse with respect to race and gender.…”
Section: Discussionsupporting
confidence: 73%
“…Although we included sex and race as factors in the analyses, we did not observe statistically significant differences in linkage to treatment as a function of these variables. As previously noted, sex and racial disparities in treatment receipt and referral have been documented in the emergency department referral to treatment setting and in national databases ( Amaducci et al, 2020 ; Martin et al, 2021 ; Webb et al, 2021 ). The lack of association in the present study may be due to our smaller sample size relative and differences in sampling design (e.g., clinical data extracted from a single ED located in Maryland vs. nationally representative sampling frames) ( Amaducci et al, 2020 ; Martin et al, 2021 ).…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 73%
See 2 more Smart Citations
“…41 Accurate disparities measurement may identify targeted interventions, such as the use of peer support specialists in substance use treatment or training that addresses interpersonal racism within a specific community. 42,43 This study has several limitations. First, BISG is not recommended for inference about American Indian/Alaska Native or multiracial populations, 16 which prevented us from examining disparities in these important groups.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 96%