1994
DOI: 10.1615/jwomenminorscieneng.v1.i3.40
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Racial/Ethnic and Gender Differences in Science Achievement of Nine-, Thirteen-, and Seventeen-Year Old Students

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
3
1
1

Citation Types

0
11
0

Year Published

1997
1997
2022
2022

Publication Types

Select...
6
1

Relationship

0
7

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 12 publications
(11 citation statements)
references
References 0 publications
0
11
0
Order By: Relevance
“…A strong correlation between attitude toward and achievement in science has been identified in various studies (Schibeci and Riley 1986, Bruschi and Anderson 1994, Weinburgh 1995. A strong correlation between attitude toward and achievement in science has been identified in various studies (Schibeci and Riley 1986, Bruschi and Anderson 1994, Weinburgh 1995.…”
Section: Conceptual Frameworkmentioning
confidence: 92%
“…A strong correlation between attitude toward and achievement in science has been identified in various studies (Schibeci and Riley 1986, Bruschi and Anderson 1994, Weinburgh 1995. A strong correlation between attitude toward and achievement in science has been identified in various studies (Schibeci and Riley 1986, Bruschi and Anderson 1994, Weinburgh 1995.…”
Section: Conceptual Frameworkmentioning
confidence: 92%
“…Although this achievement gap appears to be narrowing, ethnic minority youth still complete fewer years of school and score lower on most standardized achievement tests than White youth (Ogbu, 1992). This difference is most striking for African American students (Bruschi & Anderson, 1994). However, it is important to note that neighborhood effects loom large in these differences; particularly poverty and the prevalence of single-parent families (Steinberg & Darling, 1994).…”
Section: Childhoodmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Specifically, although girls tend to exhibit less environmental knowledge than boys (Gifford et al 1982;Blum 1987) and fall behind boys in science when taught using traditional science programming, females may exhibit higher growth in science knowledge in association with EE programming (Stevenson et al 2013). The third hypothesis emerged from recent research suggesting EE, particularly outdoor versions, may create a learning catch-up effect for underserved students in terms of affect and behavior (Stevenson et al 2013), despite the trend for these students to fall further behind on grades, standardized tests, and STEM performance in most other education interventions (Bachman 1970;Ogbu 1978;Reyes and Stanic 1988;Herring 1989;Whitworth and Barrientos 1990;Bruschi and Anderson 1994). This potential catchup effect may be related to ceiling effects (i.e., students with high initial knowledge levels having less room to improve; Liefländer and Bogner 2014), as underserved students typically have less exposure to nature and outdoor education than other students (Floyd 1999) and, thus, have more room to benefit from nature-based programming (Stevenson et al 2013).…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%