2018
DOI: 10.35680/2372-0247.1246
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Racial/ethnic and geographic differences in access to a usual source of care that follows the patient-centered medical home model: Analyses from the Medical Expenditure Panel Survey data

Abstract: This study examined racial and geographic differences in access to a usual source of care (USC) and it further explored these differences among individuals who had a USC that followed the patient-centered medical home (PCMH) model. Using cross-sectional data from the Household Component of the Medical Expenditure Panel Survey (2008-2013), our sample consisted of non-institutionalized US civilians ages 18-85 (n= 146,233; weighted n = 229,487,016). Our analysis included weighted descriptive statistics and weight… Show more

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2
2
1

Citation Types

0
4
0
1

Year Published

2019
2019
2022
2022

Publication Types

Select...
2

Relationship

1
1

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 2 publications
(5 citation statements)
references
References 31 publications
0
4
0
1
Order By: Relevance
“…These associations were statistically significant as well (see Table 2). Individuals who were confident in caring for their diabetes were also more likely to engage in 1 or more of the 4 diabetes care services; however, statistical significance was only associated with somewhat confident and having at least 1 A1C test (OR = 1.77, P < .01), confident and having a foot (text continues on p. 104) Table 1 Variables, Operational Definitions, and Weighted Tabulations (n (13) 2547 (17) 593 71176 141920 (13) 784 (11) 2309 (14) 198 (12) 1900 (12) Control 1785 (12) 342 4880 (11) 1237 (8) 548 (8) 1543 (9) 135 (8) 1292 (8) Fair, good (27) 3199 (21) 3210 (38) 2009 (25) 4333 (29) 1955 (28) 4343 (27) 454 (29) 4426 (29) High blood pressure…”
Section: Resultsmentioning
confidence: 99%
See 4 more Smart Citations
“…These associations were statistically significant as well (see Table 2). Individuals who were confident in caring for their diabetes were also more likely to engage in 1 or more of the 4 diabetes care services; however, statistical significance was only associated with somewhat confident and having at least 1 A1C test (OR = 1.77, P < .01), confident and having a foot (text continues on p. 104) Table 1 Variables, Operational Definitions, and Weighted Tabulations (n (13) 2547 (17) 593 71176 141920 (13) 784 (11) 2309 (14) 198 (12) 1900 (12) Control 1785 (12) 342 4880 (11) 1237 (8) 548 (8) 1543 (9) 135 (8) 1292 (8) Fair, good (27) 3199 (21) 3210 (38) 2009 (25) 4333 (29) 1955 (28) 4343 (27) 454 (29) 4426 (29) High blood pressure…”
Section: Resultsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…2987 (20) 2292 (27) 2019 (25) 3215 211924 (28) 3291 (20) 485 31 (12) 2119 (14) 724 9908 (11) 1910 (13) 688 (10) 2116 (13) 192 (12) 1769 (11) Angina (8) 1432 (10) 508 6536 71379 (10) 496 71388 (9) 115 71294 (8) Coronary heart disease diagnosis (18) 3055 (20) 1178 141258 (15) 2929 (19) 1013 (14) 3142 (19) 264 (17) 2755 (18) Heart attack diagnosis (13) 2120 (14) 1032 (12) 1082 (13) 2046 (14) 893 (13) 2217 (14) 174 (11) 6155 (26) 3640 (24) 2486 (29) 2483 (30) 3575 (24) 2123 (30) 3913 (24) 547 (35) 3840…”
Section: Resultsunclassified
See 3 more Smart Citations