2021
DOI: 10.1136/heartjnl-2020-318650
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Racial, ethnic and socioeconomic disparities in patients undergoing left atrial appendage closure

Abstract: ObjectiveThis manuscript aims to explore the impact of race/ethnicity and socioeconomic status on in-hospital complication rates after left atrial appendage closure (LAAC).MethodsThe US National Inpatient Sample was used to identify hospitalisations for LAAC between 1 October 2015 to 31 December 2018. These patients were stratified by race/ethnicity and quartiles of median neighbourhood income. The primary outcome was the occurrence of in-hospital major adverse events, defined as a composite of postprocedural … Show more

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2
2
1

Citation Types

2
14
0

Year Published

2021
2021
2024
2024

Publication Types

Select...
8

Relationship

1
7

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 21 publications
(16 citation statements)
references
References 25 publications
2
14
0
Order By: Relevance
“…As previously shown in both mitral TEER (8,9) and non-mitral TEER populations (5,6), our findings demonstrated a discrepancy between racial segmentation of the general public and that of an interventional cardiology cohort, which further expanded as patients aged. While non-white individuals comprised 22.1% of patients who underwent mitral TEER at our institution between 2013 and 2020, their percentage among those aged ≥65 or ≥ 75 years was 18.7% or 15.3%, respectively.…”
Section: Discussionsupporting
confidence: 73%
See 1 more Smart Citation
“…As previously shown in both mitral TEER (8,9) and non-mitral TEER populations (5,6), our findings demonstrated a discrepancy between racial segmentation of the general public and that of an interventional cardiology cohort, which further expanded as patients aged. While non-white individuals comprised 22.1% of patients who underwent mitral TEER at our institution between 2013 and 2020, their percentage among those aged ≥65 or ≥ 75 years was 18.7% or 15.3%, respectively.…”
Section: Discussionsupporting
confidence: 73%
“…Consequently, it has a central role in the management of these conditions according to the most recent North American (3) and European (4) practice guidelines. Lately, there has been increased recognition of the interaction between race/ethnicity and numerous disease states and therapies, including percutaneous structural heart interventions (5,6). While not explicitly assessed in the pivotal randomized controlled trials, racial disparities affecting the mitral TEER arena were found in real-world reports that examined shortterm, namely in-hospital, outcomes (7)(8)(9)(10).…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Three studies using NIS data on hospitalization for LAAO procedure reported underrepresentation, greater complication rate, longer hospital stay and higher discharge complexity in the non-White population receiving LAAO compared with White patients. 67,68,69 Lower socioeconomic status was not associated with a higher complication rate. 67,68,69 In another analysis using the same NIS data, only 12.4% of non-White patients were reported to have undergone the LAAO procedure in the United States.…”
Section: Left Atrial Appendage Occlusion (Laao)mentioning
confidence: 92%
“…67,68,69 Lower socioeconomic status was not associated with a higher complication rate. 67,68,69 In another analysis using the same NIS data, only 12.4% of non-White patients were reported to have undergone the LAAO procedure in the United States. 70 Higher odds of mortality and other adverse outcomes were reported in one study among non-White patients undergoing LAAO procedure compared with White patients.…”
Section: Left Atrial Appendage Occlusion (Laao)mentioning
confidence: 92%
“…Studies have shown that among individuals ≥80 years of age, >80% of this population present with multiple comorbid conditions, and comorbidity burden is a strong predictor of poor outcomes. 14 , 15 , 19 , 20 , 21 , 22 , 23 One potential explanation for the differences in CCI and ECS (lower CCI in patients ≥80 years old while higher ECS as compared with <80 years old) would be the fact that the CCI captures about half the number of comorbidities than the ECS and, therefore, the differences in P values are likely driven by the difference in sample sizes.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%