2004
DOI: 10.1016/j.ijporl.2004.01.012
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Racial/ethnic disparities in the diagnosis of otitis media in infancy

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2
1
1
1

Citation Types

4
57
2
4

Year Published

2006
2006
2022
2022

Publication Types

Select...
8

Relationship

0
8

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 54 publications
(67 citation statements)
references
References 32 publications
4
57
2
4
Order By: Relevance
“…For example, Black infants included in a study at Boston University were less likely to be diagnosed with OM than White children. 20 Similarly, a bivariate analysis from the Third National Health and Nutrition Examination Survey showed that the risk of having any ear infection was lower in non-Hispanic Black children when compared to White children. 19 Alternatively, Black infants in the Pittsburgh area had a higher cumulative proportion of days with middle ear effusion when compared to White infants.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
See 1 more Smart Citation
“…For example, Black infants included in a study at Boston University were less likely to be diagnosed with OM than White children. 20 Similarly, a bivariate analysis from the Third National Health and Nutrition Examination Survey showed that the risk of having any ear infection was lower in non-Hispanic Black children when compared to White children. 19 Alternatively, Black infants in the Pittsburgh area had a higher cumulative proportion of days with middle ear effusion when compared to White infants.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…23 One study stated that the prevalence of OM was less in Asian children than White children. 20 A greater prevalence of OM in American Indian/Alaskan Native children compared to the general U.S. population was described in two of the studies. 24,25 Last, five studies addressed the prevalence of OM in children with socioeconomic deprivation compared to children in higher socioeconomic strata.…”
Section: Prevalence Of Otitis Media In Racial/ethnic and Socioeconomimentioning
confidence: 91%
“…These differences could be due to ethnic variations in socio-economic factors (Vernacchio et al 2004) or in illness-seeking behavior (Park et al 2002), as well as genetics, but because many studies have been retrospective they have been unable to control for such confounders. Furthermore studies have been contradictory, and the conclusions of systematic (Smith & Boss 2010) relatively small total and demic population sizes, and each of these populations lived in relative geographic and social isolation.…”
Section: Ethnic Variations In Otitis Media Incidencementioning
confidence: 99%
“…Differential diagnostic misclassification is possible in this setting and could bias our results. For instance, Vernacchio et al, (2004) find that black and Asian infants are less likely to be diagnosed with otitis media than White children. Such under-reporting for non-White groups can bias our nonWhite estimates downwards.…”
Section: E11mentioning
confidence: 99%