Racial militarism and civilizational anxiety at the imperial encounter: From metropole to the postcolonial state

Abstract

In this article, I ask three key questions: First, what is the relationship between militarism and race? Second, how does colonialism shape that relationship to produce racial militarism on both sides of the imperial encounter? And, third, what is the function of racial militarism? I build on Fanon’s psychoanalytic work on the production of racial hierarchies and internalization of stigma to argue that militarism became a means through which the European imperial nation-state sought to mitigate its civilizational anxiety and assert itself at the top of a constructed hierarchy. In particular, I argue that European militarism is constituted by its colonization and historical constructions of the so-called Muslim Orient, stigmatized as a rival, a threat and an inferior neighbour. However, this racial militarism and civilizational anxiety is not only a feature of the colonial metropole, but also transferred onto colonized and postcolonial states. Drawing on examples of racial militarism practised by the Syrian regime, I argue Europe’s racial-militarist stigmas are also internalized and instrumentalized by postcolonial states via fleeing and transferral. Throughout the article, I demonstrate that racial militarism has three main functions in both metropole and postcolony: the performance of racial chauvinism and superiority; demarcation of boundaries of exclusion; and dehumanization of racialized dissent in order to legitimate violence.

Contesting colonial beachheads: Settler colonial (in)security professionals and Indigenous peoples’ energy infrastructure

“…4. This further reflects what Gani (2021), who like Coulthard, also draws from Fanon's thought, identifies as a 'civilizational anxiety' within the West.…”

Post-Soviet power hierarchies in the making: Postcolonialism in Tajikistan’s relations with Russia

“…Such type of dialectical othering is an intrinsic component of the hegemonic order of dominance, as it operates through a belief that values and morals of the dominating actor are superior to those of the subordinated one, and that the two are mutually excluding opposites. 67 However, while in post-colonial contexts differences between people have been often racialised, 68 in the post-Soviet context the differences between Russians and Tajiks are framed around ethnicities. This approach is rooted in the Soviet-era nationality policy which essentialised ethnic (rather than racial) differences between the many peoples living in the Soviet Union and institutionalised them under the banner of the 'friendship of nations' , where nations corresponded to ethnicities.…”

Racism Despite Integration: Diversity for the Sake of Mission Readiness in the U.S. Military

“…Specifically, I argue that integration in the military is framed by an ideological formation I call racial militarism, which is opposed to racial egalitarianism. Jasmine Gani argues that racial militarism “operates both as a theory of civilizational supremacy and as a practice/policy of chauvinism, exclusion, and dehumanization for the purpose of enacting violence” (2021, 547). Though racial militarism is not isolated to one country, I focus racial militarism in the U.S. context, paying particular attention to anti-black racism.…”