“…As it is possible that participants vary systematically from the population at large on an important but unknown variable (e.g., interest in racial topics), the generalizability of the present findings is limited. Despite these limitations, data sourced from Project Implicit remain a valuable resource for studying population-level prejudice, as evidenced by research showing regionally aggregated IAT scores are predictive of a variety of outcomes, including racial inequities in access to healthcare (Leitner et al, 2016, 2018), preterm births (Orchard & Price, 2017), COVID-19 cases and deaths (Cunningham & Wigfall, 2020; Thomas et al, 2020), school-based disciplinary actions (Riddle & Sinclair, 2019), and police militarization and use of lethal force (Hehman et al, 2018; Jimenez et al, 2021). Additionally, the measures of prejudice differed between Study 1 (bail recommendations) and Study 2 (IATs).…”