2022
DOI: 10.1177/02637758221084101
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Racial regimes of property: Introduction to the special issue

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
1
1
1

Citation Types

0
3
0

Year Published

2022
2022
2024
2024

Publication Types

Select...
7
1

Relationship

0
8

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 24 publications
(3 citation statements)
references
References 69 publications
0
3
0
Order By: Relevance
“…New avenues are opening to explore how colonial capitalism and dispossession structure indigenous, black and classed landscapes creating enduring racialized social formations and ongoing struggles for the return of the land and dignity (Gill 2021;Montenegro de Wit 2021;Gonda et al 2023). It has long been understood that property is a race-making institution, and this is no less the case in urbanizing agrarian social formations; resistance to urban exclusions are also taking the form of anticaste and anti-racist struggles (Ranganathan 2022;Ranganathan and Bonds 2022). In practice these forms of resistance are 'denaturalizing dispossession' (Hart 2006) and advocating for new forms of emancipatory land ownership and tenure relations.…”
Section: Labor Class Formation and Urban Agrarian Questionsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…New avenues are opening to explore how colonial capitalism and dispossession structure indigenous, black and classed landscapes creating enduring racialized social formations and ongoing struggles for the return of the land and dignity (Gill 2021;Montenegro de Wit 2021;Gonda et al 2023). It has long been understood that property is a race-making institution, and this is no less the case in urbanizing agrarian social formations; resistance to urban exclusions are also taking the form of anticaste and anti-racist struggles (Ranganathan 2022;Ranganathan and Bonds 2022). In practice these forms of resistance are 'denaturalizing dispossession' (Hart 2006) and advocating for new forms of emancipatory land ownership and tenure relations.…”
Section: Labor Class Formation and Urban Agrarian Questionsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Skye Naslund and Will McKeithen (2021), for example, make room for naming the worlds emerging from biosocial relationships between humans and helminths, intentionally orienting their proposition of and for a (brave) new world that goes beyond capitalist value and beyond the ontology of resource-as-commodity. Similarly, the Earthseed Collective, based in Durham, North Carolina, seeks connection through communion with land, rather than through the self-evidence of property as belonging to someone or something (Ranganathan and Bonds 2022), and through the understanding that social collapse, due to exploitation, devastation, and mass privatization, has already occurred (Purifoy 2020). In other words, intentionally existing differently within the OWW habitat holds the potential to recompose its web of constitutive relations.…”
Section: Unbounding the World Of Resourcesmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…While carceral real estate is commercial, rather than residential, real estate, this article contributes in a broad way to geographical research on “racialised regimes of ownership” in settler‐colonial contexts (Bhandar 2018; Ranganathan and Bonds 2022). The racialisation—and racism—of the US immigration system is well‐established, as admission and exclusion were founded upon fears of racial mixing and political efforts to protect “nativist” white, European‐descended settler colonists (see Jones 2022; Ngai 2004; Paik 2020; Zolberg 2008).…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%