2020
DOI: 10.1007/s12552-019-09277-w
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Racial Segregation and School Poverty in the United States, 1999–2016

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2
1
1
1

Citation Types

1
28
0
1

Year Published

2020
2020
2024
2024

Publication Types

Select...
9
1

Relationship

0
10

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 46 publications
(30 citation statements)
references
References 24 publications
1
28
0
1
Order By: Relevance
“…Results on FRPL participation, as a proxy for socioeconomic status, were expected to mirror those on race, given that those variables are highly correlated in national studies (Fahle et al, 2020) and present in past studies on interdistrict choice in Colorado (Carlson et al, 2011;Holme & Richards, 2009); however, that was not the case here. FRPL participation did not contribute to either of the models, suggesting that interdistrict choice ties between districts are not associated with people choosing into wealthier districts (hence presumptively better schools); this fits with recent findings on parental choice (Abdulkadiroğlu et al, 2020) and student choice (Phillippo, 2019).…”
Section: Demographic Differences Suggest Systemic Racismmentioning
confidence: 61%
“…Results on FRPL participation, as a proxy for socioeconomic status, were expected to mirror those on race, given that those variables are highly correlated in national studies (Fahle et al, 2020) and present in past studies on interdistrict choice in Colorado (Carlson et al, 2011;Holme & Richards, 2009); however, that was not the case here. FRPL participation did not contribute to either of the models, suggesting that interdistrict choice ties between districts are not associated with people choosing into wealthier districts (hence presumptively better schools); this fits with recent findings on parental choice (Abdulkadiroğlu et al, 2020) and student choice (Phillippo, 2019).…”
Section: Demographic Differences Suggest Systemic Racismmentioning
confidence: 61%
“…It is not surprising that educational attainment was the only social determinant in our final sample related to the broader category of Education Access and Quality, as both education access (e.g., school choice, availability of early education, language assistance, admissions and affordability of higher education) and education quality (e.g., school resources, teacher-to-student ratios, special education services, teacher education level, college preparatory classes, and guidance counselors) impact educational attainment. There is a large body of research demonstrating the impact of systemic racism and residential segregation on quality of education, with obvious historical roots to inequitable access to education dating well beyond Plessy v. Ferguson and Jim Crow segregation [48][49][50]. More research is warranted on specific aspects of Education Access and Quality on African American adult mental health to determine if there are micro-effects within this domain, or if educational attainment is the sole variable for depression.…”
Section: Education Access and Qualitymentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Desde ese momento, diferentes estudios han analizado el origen, magnitud y evolución de la segregación escolar por nivel socioeconómico entre las escuelas públicas y privadas en diferentes países (p.ej., Chapman, 2018;Courtioux y Maury, 2020;Fahle et al , 2020;Gorard y Smith, 2004;Monarrez, Kisida y Chingos, 2019;Murillo y Martínez-Garrido, 2017;Siddiqui, 2017;Vasquez Heilig, Brewer y Williams, 2019). Así, por ejemplo, el reciente estudio de Monarrez, Kisida y Chingos (2019), en el que se descompone la segregación escolar en función del tipo de centro, encuentra la fuerte aportación a la segregación de las escuelas privadas y las escuelas charter.…”
Section: Segregación Publico Privadounclassified