1998
DOI: 10.1080/00050069808257401
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Racism and prejudice: An Australian psychological society position paper

Abstract: City of Maribrynong n view of the rise of racist rhetoric in Australian public life in recent years, this paper reviews psychological research onI racism and prejudice as they are expressed at every level of society from government policy to the intrapersonal sphere. It draws on evidence arising from social, developmental, clinical, and community psychology. The mental health system is used as an exemplar to analyse the operation of institutionalised racism, and some observations are made about the past, prese… Show more

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
1
1
1

Citation Types

0
42
1

Year Published

2007
2007
2016
2016

Publication Types

Select...
4
4
2

Relationship

0
10

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 43 publications
(43 citation statements)
references
References 47 publications
0
42
1
Order By: Relevance
“…These findings appear to indicate a sympathetic bias toward Indigenous offenders that conflicts with the literature, suggesting that strong negative attitudes toward Indigenous Australians are common (e.g., Pedersen, Griffiths, Contos, Bishop, & Walker, 2000;Pedersen et al, 2004;Sanson et al, 1998;Walker, 1994). Feather and Souter (2002) present three possible explanations for their results: growing cultural awareness of discrimination against Indigenous people; participants attempting to portray an unprejudiced, socially desirable self-image to others; and a general cultural emphasis on egalitarianism and tolerance.…”
Section: Judging People: Effect Of Offender Ethnicity On Attributionscontrasting
confidence: 62%
“…These findings appear to indicate a sympathetic bias toward Indigenous offenders that conflicts with the literature, suggesting that strong negative attitudes toward Indigenous Australians are common (e.g., Pedersen, Griffiths, Contos, Bishop, & Walker, 2000;Pedersen et al, 2004;Sanson et al, 1998;Walker, 1994). Feather and Souter (2002) present three possible explanations for their results: growing cultural awareness of discrimination against Indigenous people; participants attempting to portray an unprejudiced, socially desirable self-image to others; and a general cultural emphasis on egalitarianism and tolerance.…”
Section: Judging People: Effect Of Offender Ethnicity On Attributionscontrasting
confidence: 62%
“…The setting of numerical targets regarding the number of Aboriginal people employed in local government as a part of an employment policy was consistently thought of as not very useful, and perhaps counterproductive and limiting. On the face of it, this appears to be contrary to the recommendations of the Don Dunstan Foundation Report , but a closer reading of that report and of the comments made here shows that both are concerned with gaining Aboriginal representation in a broad range of roles across local government, and not just an overall tally: Another concern around the setting of targets was that they should apply to each of the diversity of roles across the council, avoiding over-representation of Aboriginal people in low-level roles: A highly effective form of cultural awareness 'training', supported by the Australian Psychological Society position paper on reducing racism and prejudice (Sanson et al, 1998), is exposure to positive images of Aboriginal people that disconfirm negative stereotypes. Responsibility for compliance with policy.…”
Section: It's About Doing About Being Seen To Believe In What Yomentioning
confidence: 97%
“…However, as others have noted (Augoustinos, 2009;Sanson et al, 1998), there may be a switch from overt to covert racism, while some examples of 'old-fashioned' racism remain. The pervasive regularity of racism for some interviewees meant that it was not realistic to expect victims to actively combat it every time.…”
mentioning
confidence: 90%