2018
DOI: 10.1080/15456870.2018.1517767
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

“Racist Propaganda”: discursive Negotiations on YouTube of Perceived Anti-White Racism in South Korea

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
1
1
1
1

Citation Types

1
9
0

Year Published

2019
2019
2023
2023

Publication Types

Select...
6

Relationship

0
6

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 6 publications
(10 citation statements)
references
References 43 publications
1
9
0
Order By: Relevance
“…Less!” The comparison implies that Korea's relative lack of multiculturalism is a moral failure. This is similar to White expats' online discourse about xenophobia in Korea (Oh, ). While they do not say that Korea is explicitly intolerant, they imply the moral superiority and racial openness of the West.…”
Section: Constructing Progressive White Supremacysupporting
confidence: 70%
“…Less!” The comparison implies that Korea's relative lack of multiculturalism is a moral failure. This is similar to White expats' online discourse about xenophobia in Korea (Oh, ). While they do not say that Korea is explicitly intolerant, they imply the moral superiority and racial openness of the West.…”
Section: Constructing Progressive White Supremacysupporting
confidence: 70%
“…Comments in languages other than English (LOTE), apparent for all cases, provided data about the cultural diversity of the audience. Despite the brevity of many of these comments, automated translation was not used, to avoid losing nuances in dialog identifiable only with specific cultural knowledge, an issue previously noted in intercultural research on YouTube comments ( Oh, 2018 ).…”
Section: Resultsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Although some usernames appear to include masculine names such as “John”, there is no evidence available on whether the individuals involved actually were male. As Oh () notes, “it is the racialized, rhetorical purposes of online comments more than actual identities that matter in cyberspace” (Oh, , p. 307). Accordingly, we have treated all the participants in a gender‐neutral fashion when analysing their contributions.…”
Section: Methodsmentioning
confidence: 99%