Proceedings of the 2016 Design, Automation &Amp; Test in Europe Conference &Amp; Exhibition (DATE) 2016
DOI: 10.3850/9783981537079_1014
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Rack-scale Disaggregated Cloud Data Centers: The dReDBox Project Vision

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2
1
1

Citation Types

0
42
0

Year Published

2017
2017
2023
2023

Publication Types

Select...
5
2
2

Relationship

1
8

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 57 publications
(54 citation statements)
references
References 6 publications
0
42
0
Order By: Relevance
“…The authors in [31] studied the trade-off between cost and performance of building a disaggregated memory system; they constructed a simple cost model that compares the savings expected from a disaggregated memory system to the expected costs, such as latency and bandwidth costs, and then identified the level at which a disaggregated memory system becomes cost competitive with a traditional directattached memory system. In [32], the authors proposed a software-defined architecture for the next generation data center, dRedBox, and presented a design prototype hardware architecture where system-on-chip (SoC)-based microservers, memory modules, and accelerators are placed in separated modular server trays interconnected via a high-speed, lowlatency optoelectronic system fabric and are allocated in arbitrary sets. In [33][34][35], we presented a detailed description and comprehensive review of the idea of DS, with a focus on the energy efficiency benefits of this design.…”
Section: Future Energy Efficient Data Centers With Disaggregated Serversmentioning
confidence: 99%
See 1 more Smart Citation
“…The authors in [31] studied the trade-off between cost and performance of building a disaggregated memory system; they constructed a simple cost model that compares the savings expected from a disaggregated memory system to the expected costs, such as latency and bandwidth costs, and then identified the level at which a disaggregated memory system becomes cost competitive with a traditional directattached memory system. In [32], the authors proposed a software-defined architecture for the next generation data center, dRedBox, and presented a design prototype hardware architecture where system-on-chip (SoC)-based microservers, memory modules, and accelerators are placed in separated modular server trays interconnected via a high-speed, lowlatency optoelectronic system fabric and are allocated in arbitrary sets. In [33][34][35], we presented a detailed description and comprehensive review of the idea of DS, with a focus on the energy efficiency benefits of this design.…”
Section: Future Energy Efficient Data Centers With Disaggregated Serversmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Generating the traffic demand matrix: (40) (41) (42) Constraint (40) generates the CPU-MEM traffic matrix based on the index matrix calculated previously in constraints (32) and (33), and which is the VM CPU-MEM traffic demands. Constraints (41) and (42) generate the CPU-IO and Memory-IO traffic matrices respectively, using the relevant variables.…”
Section: ) Communication Constraintsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…With conventional DCs experiencing drawbacks in server resource utilization, power consumption and scalability, novel solutions must be explored to effectively manage this traffic trend. Disaggregation of servers into separate standalone CPU, memory, storage and network resource pools has been projected in [2,3] as a promising solution to improve resource utilization, efficiency, modularity and upgradeability in DCs. In addition, hybrid DC architectures employing both electronic and optical technologies [4][5][6] and all-optical technologies [7][8][9] have been explored and have demonstrated benefits in terms of power consumption, modularity and cost in comparison to conventional DCs.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Disaggregation of traditional DC resource can be performed at different scales i.e. rack-scale [5], [17] and pod-scale [18], [19] as shown in Figure 1(a) and 1(b) respectively. Likewise, the network interconnecting disaggregated resources can be electrical, hybrid (electro-optical) or all optical.…”
mentioning
confidence: 99%