2015
DOI: 10.1083/jcb.201406099
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Rad51-mediated replication fork reversal is a global response to genotoxic treatments in human cells

Abstract: Genotoxic treatments in human cells consistently induce uncoupling of replication forks and their remodeling into four-way junctions by the RAD51 recombinase.

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
1
1
1
1

Citation Types

71
738
5
1

Year Published

2015
2015
2024
2024

Publication Types

Select...
10

Relationship

1
9

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 600 publications
(856 citation statements)
references
References 61 publications
71
738
5
1
Order By: Relevance
“…We also show that accumulation of these unusual replication intermediates is accompanied by DDR activation and chromatin recruitment of DSB repair factors, suggesting the conceptually attractive hypothesis that the formation of DNA ends (regressed arms) by fork reversal could contribute to checkpoint signaling. It should be noted, however, that other experimental conditions recently reported to induce similar levels of reversed replication forks have not been associated with DDR activation (11,(32)(33)(34), excluding the possibility that fork reversal per se is sufficient to induce checkpoint activation and chromatin recruitment of DSB repair factors. Checkpoint activation upon PAR accumulation may directly reflect the recently reported physical association of PAR with checkpoint factors, such as CHK1 (35).…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 94%
“…We also show that accumulation of these unusual replication intermediates is accompanied by DDR activation and chromatin recruitment of DSB repair factors, suggesting the conceptually attractive hypothesis that the formation of DNA ends (regressed arms) by fork reversal could contribute to checkpoint signaling. It should be noted, however, that other experimental conditions recently reported to induce similar levels of reversed replication forks have not been associated with DDR activation (11,(32)(33)(34), excluding the possibility that fork reversal per se is sufficient to induce checkpoint activation and chromatin recruitment of DSB repair factors. Checkpoint activation upon PAR accumulation may directly reflect the recently reported physical association of PAR with checkpoint factors, such as CHK1 (35).…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 94%
“…-MBD cells to 10 nM CPT, a dose that typically causes mild replicative stress without inducing substantial DNA breaks (34) (Fig. 4A), triggered a significant increase in the number of chromosomal aberrations (Fig.…”
Section: Resultsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…3 C and Fig. S3 A), which does not lead to extensive DNA breakage (Zellweger et al, 2015). Using native BrdU staining to visualize ssDNA formation in S phase cells, we found that the increased amount of ssDNA generated in response to CPT-induced replication stress was suppressed by TRA IP knockdown (Fig.…”
Section: Tra Ip Facilitates Ssdna Formation and Checkpoint Signalingmentioning
confidence: 95%