2007
DOI: 10.1016/j.dnarep.2006.08.007
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Rad52 and Rad59 exhibit both overlapping and distinct functions

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
1
1
1
1

Citation Types

0
37
0

Year Published

2007
2007
2016
2016

Publication Types

Select...
9
1

Relationship

2
8

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 34 publications
(37 citation statements)
references
References 43 publications
0
37
0
Order By: Relevance
“…Rad22 shows 35% similarity and 24% identity with Rad52 of S. cerevisiae, while Rti1 shows 32 and 19%, respectively (supplemental Figure A1). Both fission yeast proteins display significant homology to Rad59, but unlike Rad59, both carry a C-terminal domain for interaction with Rad51 (Bai and Symington 1996;van den Bosch et al 2002;Feng et al 2007). Conservation is strongest in the Nterminal region, which contains the Rad52/22 homology domain common to all members of the RAD52 superfamily (Iyer et al 2002), whereas the C-terminal ends of the proteins show more variability (Figure 1 and supplemental Figure A1).…”
Section: Resultsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Rad22 shows 35% similarity and 24% identity with Rad52 of S. cerevisiae, while Rti1 shows 32 and 19%, respectively (supplemental Figure A1). Both fission yeast proteins display significant homology to Rad59, but unlike Rad59, both carry a C-terminal domain for interaction with Rad51 (Bai and Symington 1996;van den Bosch et al 2002;Feng et al 2007). Conservation is strongest in the Nterminal region, which contains the Rad52/22 homology domain common to all members of the RAD52 superfamily (Iyer et al 2002), whereas the C-terminal ends of the proteins show more variability (Figure 1 and supplemental Figure A1).…”
Section: Resultsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…However, differences in the biochemical characteristics of the Rad52 and Rad59 proteins [35], and the genetic characteristics of the rad52 and rad59 mutants [82] suggest that they are paralogs. Our genetic results support this as the rad52 rad59 double mutant is more defective for DSB-stimulated translocation than either single mutant, particularly when the 60 bp substrates are used (Table 3).…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Vectors, expressing C-terminally YFP-tagged Rad52 species containing alanine substitution mutations, were derivatives of the CEN-based plasmid, pWJ1213 (26), harboring RAD52 fused to YFP and a HIS3 marker for selection. Specifically, the polylinker of pWJ1213 was removed by a blunt end ligation of ends obtained by cutting pWJ1213 with SacI, followed by removal of the 3Ј-overhang by T4 polymerase and with XmaI, where the 5Ј-overhang was filled in by T4 polymerase, to produce the plasmid pWJ1213-⌬XmaI-SacI.…”
Section: Methodsmentioning
confidence: 99%