2003
DOI: 10.1128/mcb.23.18.6363-6372.2003
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Rad52-Independent Accumulation of Joint Circular Minichromosomes during S Phase in Saccharomyces cerevisiae

Abstract: We investigated the formation of X-shaped molecules consisting of joint circular minichromosomes (joint molecules) in Saccharomyces cerevisiae by two-dimensional neutral/neutral gel electrophoresis of psoralencross-linked DNA. The appearance of joint molecules was found to be replication dependent. The joint molecules had physical properties reminiscent of Holliday junctions or hemicatenanes, as monitored by strand displacement, branch migration, and nuclease digestion. Physical linkage of the joint molecules … Show more

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2
1
1
1

Citation Types

0
20
0

Year Published

2003
2003
2023
2023

Publication Types

Select...
9

Relationship

1
8

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 20 publications
(20 citation statements)
references
References 61 publications
0
20
0
Order By: Relevance
“…The abnormal accumulation of X molecules observed in MMS-treated sgs1 cells, together with the observation that a population of X structure is indeed able to migrate with the same kinetics as in MMS-treated wild-type cells, raises the question as to whether the X structures that keep accumulating at late time points represent SCJs or, rather, different intermediates. It should be noted that at least two types of molecules migrate like an X spike on 2D gels: hemicatenanes and HJs (Collins and Newlon 1994;Lockshon et al 1995;Schwacha and Kleckner 1995;Zou and Rothstein 1997;Lucas and Hyrien 2000;Lopes et al 2003;Wellinger et al 2003). Given that SCJs have been suggested to represent hemicatenanes (Lopes et al 2003), we tested whether the X molecules abnormally accumulating in MMS-treated sgs1 cells were instead recombination-dependent structures.…”
Section: Resultsmentioning
confidence: 99%
See 1 more Smart Citation
“…The abnormal accumulation of X molecules observed in MMS-treated sgs1 cells, together with the observation that a population of X structure is indeed able to migrate with the same kinetics as in MMS-treated wild-type cells, raises the question as to whether the X structures that keep accumulating at late time points represent SCJs or, rather, different intermediates. It should be noted that at least two types of molecules migrate like an X spike on 2D gels: hemicatenanes and HJs (Collins and Newlon 1994;Lockshon et al 1995;Schwacha and Kleckner 1995;Zou and Rothstein 1997;Lucas and Hyrien 2000;Lopes et al 2003;Wellinger et al 2003). Given that SCJs have been suggested to represent hemicatenanes (Lopes et al 2003), we tested whether the X molecules abnormally accumulating in MMS-treated sgs1 cells were instead recombination-dependent structures.…”
Section: Resultsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…In general, four-branched molecules migrate on 2D gels in the so-called X spike (Brewer and Fangman 1987). X-shaped structures on 2D gels have been related to HJs (Collins and Newlon 1994;Lockshon et al 1995;Schwacha and Kleckner 1995;Zou and Rothstein 1997) or to hemicatenanes (Lucas and Hyrien 2000;Lopes et al 2003;Wellinger et al 2003). The X-shaped SCJ structure Figure 7.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…In accordance with a replicon-like structure, the bubble-shaped molecules were resistant to in vitro RNase H treatment and heat-induced branch migration. Furthermore, as expected for replicating molecules having an extendable 3′ end, in vitro DNA synthesis by Klenow/gp32 treatment could destroy the bubble-shaped molecules by strand displacement (43). These analyses rule out the presence of long stretches of R-loops, which could have a bubble-like appearance, and suggest a rapid conversion of R-loops into noncanonical replicons.…”
Section: R-loops Promote Genome Instability and Noncanonical Replicationmentioning
confidence: 96%
“…After the culture was brought to 1% glucose or 1% galactose, cells were grown for another 3.5 to 4 h prior to DNA isolation. DNA isolation, restriction enzyme digestion, and two-dimensional (2D) gel analysis were performed as described previously (45). Prior to 2D gel analysis, the amount of plasmid DNA was determined to adjust for equal loadings.…”
Section: Methodsmentioning
confidence: 99%