2003
DOI: 10.2514/1.16
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Radar Cross Section Constraints in Flight Path Optimization

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2
1
1
1

Citation Types

1
8
0

Year Published

2005
2005
2008
2008

Publication Types

Select...
2

Relationship

1
1

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 2 publications
(9 citation statements)
references
References 0 publications
1
8
0
Order By: Relevance
“…15,16 A more general formulation in three dimensions was developed using a continuous and differentiable RCS representation. 17 Similar work has been performed by Misovec et al 18 This method works well for relatively short total flight distances, that is, in the 50-100 km range. For large distances many time steps are needed to resolve the rigid-body dynamics of the aircraft, which results in very large optimization problems.…”
Section: Introductionsupporting
confidence: 68%
“…15,16 A more general formulation in three dimensions was developed using a continuous and differentiable RCS representation. 17 Similar work has been performed by Misovec et al 18 This method works well for relatively short total flight distances, that is, in the 50-100 km range. For large distances many time steps are needed to resolve the rigid-body dynamics of the aircraft, which results in very large optimization problems.…”
Section: Introductionsupporting
confidence: 68%
“…The optimization problem, defined by Eqs. (2) and (3), then can be stated in the following NLP form:…”
Section: Reformulationmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Lower and upper bounds are represented by lb and ub, respectively. Equations (2) and (3) are standard in optimal control and are further explained in [15,18].…”
Section: Parameterizationmentioning
confidence: 99%
See 2 more Smart Citations