1994
DOI: 10.1109/36.312903
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Radar estimates of aboveground biomass in boreal forests of interior Alaska

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2
1
1

Citation Types

7
83
2

Year Published

1999
1999
2017
2017

Publication Types

Select...
5
3

Relationship

0
8

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 147 publications
(93 citation statements)
references
References 19 publications
7
83
2
Order By: Relevance
“…The best predictions were obtained using the HH channel and averaging coherence data at 5 ha scale (Table 3). In the case of backscatter, we observed a linear increase with stand age and no saturation as previously found with aboveground biomass in other boreal sites [41,42]. However, stand age showed a tighter relationship with InSAR coherence, as has been previously found for C-band studies [20].…”
Section: Discussionsupporting
confidence: 56%
“…The best predictions were obtained using the HH channel and averaging coherence data at 5 ha scale (Table 3). In the case of backscatter, we observed a linear increase with stand age and no saturation as previously found with aboveground biomass in other boreal sites [41,42]. However, stand age showed a tighter relationship with InSAR coherence, as has been previously found for C-band studies [20].…”
Section: Discussionsupporting
confidence: 56%
“…The adjusted 2 and RMSE of model P1 are 0.16 and 58.01 Mg/ha, respectively ( Table 8). The week correlation between SAR backscattering coefficients and forest AGB is also reported in previous studies [25,81,87]. In model P2, the adjusted 2 is increased to 0.25 and RMSE decrease to 47.0 Mg/ha (Table 8).…”
Section: Forest Agb Estimation Model Based On Corrected Datamentioning
confidence: 48%
“…Previous studies show that L-band backscattering tends to increase with increasing canopy cover, density and size of the tree [19,[24][25][26]. Both co-polarized (HH and VV) and cross-polarized (HV and VH) of L-bands are sensitive to forest biomass [19,27,28].…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
See 1 more Smart Citation
“…In addition to measuring one-time biomass densities, pol-SAR also provides the 589 capability of monitoring biomass changes resulting from clear-cutting, forest fires, insect 590 disturbance, wind damage, and to some extent more subtle changes in forest structure 591 (Saatchi et al 1997;Rignot et al 1994;Couturier et al 2001;Siegert et al 2001;Salas et 592 al. 2002;Ranson et al 2003).…”
mentioning
confidence: 99%