1999
DOI: 10.1016/s0963-8695(99)00026-2
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Radar measurement of bridge scour

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
1
1
1
1

Citation Types

0
47
0
2

Year Published

2013
2013
2024
2024

Publication Types

Select...
6
2

Relationship

0
8

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 73 publications
(49 citation statements)
references
References 2 publications
0
47
0
2
Order By: Relevance
“…Therefore, the paper proposes a method that would allow the estimation of scour depth for a given observed pile frequency. Scour Monitoring: The accurate assessment and monitoring of existing structures to progressive scour has come to the fore of research in recent years [7,8]. A myriad of current technology aims to detect the existence and severity of scour around the foundation systems of existing bridge structures.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
See 1 more Smart Citation
“…Therefore, the paper proposes a method that would allow the estimation of scour depth for a given observed pile frequency. Scour Monitoring: The accurate assessment and monitoring of existing structures to progressive scour has come to the fore of research in recent years [7,8]. A myriad of current technology aims to detect the existence and severity of scour around the foundation systems of existing bridge structures.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Devices using this method work very well at detecting the depth of scour in a particular location, but require costly underwater installations and are also susceptible to background radiation. Ground Penetrating Radar (GPR) is an effective tool for the immediate monitoring of scour-critical foundation systems [7,13]. A GPR Published in Journal of sound and vibration 332 (25), 2013 pp.…”
mentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Scour erosion of bridge foundation soil is the number one cause of bridge failure in bridges located over waterways [1][2][3]. One study found that 53% of 500 bridge failures occurring between 1989 and 2000 in the United States occurred as a result of flooding and/or scour problems [4].…”
Section: Bridge Scourmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Time-Domain Reflectometry (TDR) systems use changes in dielectric permittivity to monitor the location of the soil-water interface relative to a fixed probe [8,9]. Similarly, Ground Penetrating Radar (GPR) can be used to detect scour holes using high frequency electromagnetic waves, which are partially reflected as they pass through different media [3,10]. Sound wave devices such as Sonic Fathometers [5,9,11], Reflection Seismic Profilers [5,10] and Echo Sounders [10] emit sonic pulses to locate the soil-water interface and, hence, the scour depth, using a similar approach to the radar methods.…”
Section: Direct Monitoring Of Bridge Scour Using Depthmeasuring Instrmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…To 3.3-5 overcome limitations in this assessment process, significant efforts have been made to design remote systems capable of relaying information about scour reducing the need for manual intervention. These systems can be broadly categorized as follows (Prendergast & Gavin 2014): single-use devices (NCHRP 2009;Briaud et al 2011), pulse or radar devices (Forde et al 1999;Yu 2009;Yankielun & Zabilansky 1999), buried or driven rod systems (NCHRP 2009;De Falco & Mele 2002;Zarafshan et al 2012;Fisher et al 2013), sound-wave devices (Nassif et al 2002;Fisher et al 2013;Anderson et al 2007), fiber-Bragg grating devices (Lin et al 2006;May et al 2002) and electrical conductivity devices (Anderson et al 2007). Table 1 gives an overview of the function and detection methodology of a number of types of instrument available.…”
Section: Shm For Scourmentioning
confidence: 99%