1988
DOI: 10.1175/1520-0469(1988)045<3741:roasot>2.0.co;2
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Radar Observations and Simulation of the Melting Layer of Precipitation

Abstract: Take-down policy If you believe that this document breaches copyright please contact us providing details, and we will remove access to the work immediately and investigate your claim.

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
3
1
1

Citation Types

6
101
0

Year Published

1991
1991
2022
2022

Publication Types

Select...
7
1

Relationship

0
8

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 145 publications
(107 citation statements)
references
References 0 publications
6
101
0
Order By: Relevance
“…The question of deciding whether wet snow is modeled better by water inclusions in a dry snow (i.e., ice plus air) matrix or by dry snow in water has been on the table for a while, and there is no definite answer yet. However, there is a growing consensus, supported also by the comparison of radar measurements with theoretical predictions [Klaassen, 1988], that wet snow is better this will be the model we will adopt in this work.…”
Section: Modeling the Melting Layermentioning
confidence: 97%
See 1 more Smart Citation
“…The question of deciding whether wet snow is modeled better by water inclusions in a dry snow (i.e., ice plus air) matrix or by dry snow in water has been on the table for a while, and there is no definite answer yet. However, there is a growing consensus, supported also by the comparison of radar measurements with theoretical predictions [Klaassen, 1988], that wet snow is better this will be the model we will adopt in this work.…”
Section: Modeling the Melting Layermentioning
confidence: 97%
“…(dp,•/dT)lr=To • 0.332 [Zhang, 1994]. We have also assumed with Klaassen [1988] As said, the shape of the melting hydrometeors can be extremely complex; as often happens when a model has to be developed, we have to simplify the reality and assume a shape that can be analytically treatable. In particular, at the top of the melting layer the ellipticity is supposed to be maximum (i.e., the particles are more distorted), and it decreases to the standard value for rain [Oguchi, 1983] …”
Section: Modeling the Melting Layermentioning
confidence: 99%
“…The algorithm works by exploiting the characteristic shape of a reflectivity profile containing a bright band. The algorithm is adapted from one described in Klaassen (1988). If no melting layer is found to exist, the profile is labeled as convective.…”
Section: Algorithm To Estimate Dsdmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…The other models are in between. The value for the snow density is truncated at 0.9 and 0.005 g cm Ϫ3 as suggested by Klaassen (1988). Battaglia et al (2003) provides a parameterization for the velocity of a melting particle derived from Mitra et al's (1990) experimental work and shows that the output of the melting layer model is not very sensitive to the parameterization for the fall velocity.…”
Section: A Melting Layer Thermodynamic Modelmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Microwave radiation is sensitive to the presence of liquid water on ice-phase precipitation (e.g., Klassen, 1988), due, primarily, to the large difference in the dielectric constants of the two materials at microwave frequencies. However, the relationship between the early stages of melting and incident microwave radiation has not been well described in the literature.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%