2020
DOI: 10.1049/iet-rsn.2019.0331
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Radar signals classification using energy‐time‐frequency distribution features

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
3
1
1

Citation Types

0
9
0

Year Published

2021
2021
2024
2024

Publication Types

Select...
7
1

Relationship

0
8

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 20 publications
(9 citation statements)
references
References 20 publications
0
9
0
Order By: Relevance
“…After choosing an appropriate segmenting method, we examine different classifiers in several circumstances. We choose nine common classifiers to recognize emitter identification, containing kernel support vector machine (KSVM) [20], probabilistic neural Fig. 7 Plots of moments for various emitters network (PNN) [12], k-nearest neighbor (KNN) [14], discriminant analysis classifier (DAC) [21], and their variants.…”
Section: Classificationmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…After choosing an appropriate segmenting method, we examine different classifiers in several circumstances. We choose nine common classifiers to recognize emitter identification, containing kernel support vector machine (KSVM) [20], probabilistic neural Fig. 7 Plots of moments for various emitters network (PNN) [12], k-nearest neighbor (KNN) [14], discriminant analysis classifier (DAC) [21], and their variants.…”
Section: Classificationmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…The normalized difference description index values of fingerprint features under different target numbers of radiation sources I (I=3, 5,10,15,20) is shown in Table 9, where X represents the original IP feature, Y 0 is the enlarged feature without correlation calculation, and Y is the enlarged UMME feature calculated by the proposed method.…”
Section: Overall Change Of Featuresmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…ASD, also known as "local wave decomposition", has been widely applied in several research fields [27,28]. For RFF problems, ASD is usually used to directly decompose the time-domain waveform of individual signals and further extract new fingerprint features rather than distinguishing UIM [14,15,22]. Liang et al [29] used empirical mode decomposition to obtain stray components.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…The computed covariance matrices are used as polarimetric-contextual features. They are given to a support vector machine (SVM) classifier with a matrix logarithm-based kernel [24,25]. Finally, a guided filter [26] is applied to the initial classification map to remove the noisy pixels and achieve a smoothed classification map by preserving the discontinuities and edges.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%