2020
DOI: 10.3390/s21010210
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Radar-Spectrogram-Based UAV Classification Using Convolutional Neural Networks

Abstract: With the upsurge in the use of Unmanned Aerial Vehicles (UAVs) in various fields, detecting and identifying them in real-time are becoming important topics. However, the identification of UAVs is difficult due to their characteristics such as low altitude, slow speed, and small radar cross-section (LSS). With the existing deterministic approach, the algorithm becomes complex and requires a large number of computations, making it unsuitable for real-time systems. Hence, effective alternatives enabling real-time… Show more

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
3
1
1

Citation Types

0
20
0
1

Year Published

2021
2021
2024
2024

Publication Types

Select...
9

Relationship

0
9

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 33 publications
(21 citation statements)
references
References 14 publications
0
20
0
1
Order By: Relevance
“…Nevertheless, the differences for SVM-G:OB and other feature sets with SVM-G are smaller than the critical difference. Figures [10][11][12] show the Bayesian Signed-Rank Tests posteriors, for the RF, SVM-L, and SVM-G classifiers, respectively, for the difficult datasets. In Figure 10, for RF, the feature sets with more favorable results when compared to (OB) are (t), (OT), (Ot), and (All), with a probability of 1.000 for the corresponding feature set, and 0.000 for (OB).…”
Section: Results For the So-called Difficult Datasetsmentioning
confidence: 99%
See 1 more Smart Citation
“…Nevertheless, the differences for SVM-G:OB and other feature sets with SVM-G are smaller than the critical difference. Figures [10][11][12] show the Bayesian Signed-Rank Tests posteriors, for the RF, SVM-L, and SVM-G classifiers, respectively, for the difficult datasets. In Figure 10, for RF, the feature sets with more favorable results when compared to (OB) are (t), (OT), (Ot), and (All), with a probability of 1.000 for the corresponding feature set, and 0.000 for (OB).…”
Section: Results For the So-called Difficult Datasetsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Even daily or ordinary activities (e.g., cooking, eating, and resting) may be classified using this type of acquisition technology [9]. Usually, human action recognition is made using sensors whose location is fixed, but new approaches using unmanned aerial vehicles (UAVs) are starting to appear [10].…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…It is difficult to identify UAVs since they fly around at low altitudes and with small radar cross sections (LCS); hence, a new identification scheme for UAVs should be devised to overcome the limitation of the existing system. D. Park et al [ 7 ] present a method to employ a deep learning based classification algorithm based on micro-Doppler signature of UAVs represented on radar spectrum images. The proposed scheme was designed to detect and identify UAVs in real time.…”
Section: Summary Of the Special Issuementioning
confidence: 99%
“…The time-frequency analysis method uses the principle that sea clutter and target have different time-frequency characteristics in time-frequency domain to suppress sea clutter. Short time Fourier transform [ 46 , 47 ], fractional Fourier transform [ 48 , 49 , 50 , 51 , 52 ] and sparse Fourier transform [ 53 , 54 , 55 ] all belong to this method. This method transforms the time series data on a range bin into time-frequency domain by using different time-frequency transform.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%