2017
DOI: 10.1093/bioinformatics/btw783
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

RADER: a RApid DEcoy Retriever to facilitate decoy based assessment of virtual screening

Abstract: Supplementary data are available at Bioinformatics online.

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
4
1

Citation Types

0
20
0

Year Published

2018
2018
2024
2024

Publication Types

Select...
9

Relationship

1
8

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 27 publications
(20 citation statements)
references
References 10 publications
0
20
0
Order By: Relevance
“…After that, triple corresponding decoys were generated in RApid DEcoy Retriever (RADER) online database with a similarity threshold value of 0.75 between liver toxic compounds and decoys (Ling et al, 2016). Only molecules with molecular weight between 100 and 800 were preserved.…”
Section: Methodsmentioning
confidence: 99%
See 1 more Smart Citation
“…After that, triple corresponding decoys were generated in RApid DEcoy Retriever (RADER) online database with a similarity threshold value of 0.75 between liver toxic compounds and decoys (Ling et al, 2016). Only molecules with molecular weight between 100 and 800 were preserved.…”
Section: Methodsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…We considered the liver toxic compounds as hepatotoxic (labeled as “1”) during the calculation. Since decoys were randomly selected from a massive “decoy pool” containing 70,030,298 compounds (Ling et al, 2016) after eliminating hepatotoxic compounds, decoys were supposed as non-hepatotoxic (labeled as “0”) in this study. Eventually, the training set contained 453 hepatotoxic compounds and 1,359 non-hepatotoxic compounds, while the test set was consisted of 166 hepatotoxic compounds and 498 non-hepatotoxic compounds.…”
Section: Methodsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…The robustness of the predictive model was also checked by decoy set using RApid DEcoy Retriever (RADER) software (Wang et al, 2017). The decoy set are the chemicals with similar H-bond donor, molecular weight, and logP but chemically dissimilar than active molcules (Rajput and Kumar, 2018).…”
Section: Methodsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…We used decoy set to check the robustness of our developed models. There were few tools like DUD (Huang et al, 2006), DecoyFinder (Cereto-Massague et al, 2012), and RADER (Wang et al, 2017) for designing the decoys of the chemicals. In our study, the decoys were generated from the latest tool, i.e., RApid DEcoy Retriever (RADER) software (Wang et al, 2017) against the 2168 anti-flavi chemicals with similar 1D physicochemical properties but different 2D topology.…”
Section: Methodsmentioning
confidence: 99%