The present study assessed the effects of dietary restriction on tibial and vertebral mechanical and geometrical properties in 2-mo-old male Wistar rats. Two-month-old male Wistar rats were randomized to the ad libitum (n ϭ 8) or the 35% dietrestricted (DR) feeding group (n ϭ 9) for 5 mo. Tibiae and L 6 vertebrae were dissected out for microcomputed tomography (CT) scanning and subsequently fractured in biomechanical testing to determine geometrical and mechanical properties. The DR group had significantly lower mean tibial length, mass, area, and cross-sectional moment of inertia, as well as vertebral energy to maximal load. After adjustment for body mass, however, DR tibial mean maximal load and stiffness, and DR vertebral area, height, volume, and maximal load were significantly greater, relative to ad libitum means. No significant differences were found between the DR and ad libitum mineral ash fractions. Because the material properties of the tibiae between the two groups were not significantly different, presumably the material integrity of the bones was not adversely affected as a consequence of DR. The similar material characteristics were consistent with mineral ash fractions that were not different between the two groups. Vertebral maximal load and stiffness were not significant between the DR and ad libitum animals. Importantly, we show that a level of dietary restriction (35%) that is less severe than many studies (40%), and without micronutrient compensation does not adversely affect tibial and vertebral mechanical properties in young growing male rats when normalized for body mass. th lumbar CT, microcomputed tomography DR has emerged as an important avenue of investigation in the area of aging-specifically the prevention of aging. DR can increase both mean and maximal life span in a variety of animals, including rodents and primates (1). Whereas some studies of DR have focused singularly on reducing total calories, without compensation for micronutrient intake (2-4), others have maintained adequate and equal vitamin and mineral status for both DR and ad libitum animals (5,6). Studyto-study variations exist in method and degree of restriction, period of dietary restriction, and the age at onset of restriction, and contribute to the lack of consensus on the effects of dietary restriction on bone adaptation.Talbott et al. (7) used "younger" (3-mo-old) and "older" (10-mo-old) female Sprague-Dawley rats, matched for body mass and assigned to one of four diet groups representing two levels of energy (referred to as "caloric") intake and two levels of calcium intake. All rats had the same baseline diet (protein, fat, fiber, vitamins, and other minerals), but differed in caloric intake (normal versus 40% restriction) by reduced carbohydrate content or levels of calcium intake (normal ϭ 78 mg/d and low ϭ 15 mg/d). Rats were, therefore, restricted in calcium only, calories only, or calcium and calories, for a period of 9 wk. Dietary restriction of calcium or energy resulted in an elevated rate of bone turno...