1968
DOI: 10.1029/ja073i003p01013
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Radial diffusion coefficient for electrons at lowLvalues

Abstract: An empirical evaluation of the diffusion coefficient for trapped electrons diffusing across low L shells is obtained by adjusting the coefficient to account for the observed radial profile and the long‐term decay rate of the trapped electron flux. The diffusion mechanism is not identified, but it is assumed that the adiabatic invariants µ and J are conserved. The average value of the coefficient for electrons > 1.6 Mev energy is found to decrease monotonically from ∼4 × 10−6 RE²/day at L = 1.16 to ∼2 × 10−7 RE… Show more

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
4
1

Citation Types

2
13
0

Year Published

2016
2016
2018
2018

Publication Types

Select...
5

Relationship

0
5

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 47 publications
(15 citation statements)
references
References 19 publications
2
13
0
Order By: Relevance
“…Such lifetimes were measured in the artificial belt formed after the 1962 Starfish nuclear detonation and found to be in close agreement with theoretical predictions [Walt, 1964]. However, after a few months the decay rate of trapped electron intensity slowed and this was interpreted as evidence for replenishment by inward diffusion [Newkirk and Walt, 1968;Walt and Farley, 1976]. A similar conclusion was reached in the case of the low-altitude (L ≲ 1.3) natural radiation belt, where observed electron decay rates were also much slower than expected on the basis of atmospheric scattering alone [Selesnick, 2012[Selesnick, , 2016.…”
Section: Introductionsupporting
confidence: 82%
“…Such lifetimes were measured in the artificial belt formed after the 1962 Starfish nuclear detonation and found to be in close agreement with theoretical predictions [Walt, 1964]. However, after a few months the decay rate of trapped electron intensity slowed and this was interpreted as evidence for replenishment by inward diffusion [Newkirk and Walt, 1968;Walt and Farley, 1976]. A similar conclusion was reached in the case of the low-altitude (L ≲ 1.3) natural radiation belt, where observed electron decay rates were also much slower than expected on the basis of atmospheric scattering alone [Selesnick, 2012[Selesnick, , 2016.…”
Section: Introductionsupporting
confidence: 82%
“…The neoclassical radial diffusion coefficient D L*L* is the lower-right component of the diffusion tensor on the left-hand side of equation (10). We have computed this and plotted it in Figure 5 for several color-coded values of K. Also plotted in Figure 5 as a histogram is the radial diffusion coefficient D LL inferred by Newkirk and Walt (1968) as being needed to account for the longer-than-expected apparent lifetimes observed by Imhof et al (1967). Newkirk and Walt (1968) derived the expected lifetimes from the theory of Walt and MacDonald (1964) for 1.6 MeV electrons.…”
Section: Journal Of Geophysical Research: Space Physicsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Imhof et al (1967) hypothesized that the longer apparent lifetimes might be due to radial diffusion acting as a source from higher L-shells to offset the loss from pitch angle diffusion. Newkirk and Walt (1968) calculated the radial diffusion coefficient that would be necessary to produce the apparent lifetimes, assuming that the real lifetimes were dominated by Coulomb collisions and that the radial diffusion process conserved the first two adiabatic invariants, consistent with the then-recent theory of Fälthammar (1965). The radial diffusion coefficients inferred by Newkirk and Walt (1968) showed a strongly inverse variation with L. They acknowledged that this trend was contrary to the radial-diffusion mechanisms studied by Fälthammar (1965), who found a strong increase in the radial diffusion coefficient with increasing L-value.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
See 1 more Smart Citation
“…The intensity decayed over the next several years, and decay rates were compared to predictions based on theory of electron scattering by the upper atmosphere [Walt, 1964]. They were found to be in substantial agreement for a few months after the Starfish detonation, but subsequent slower decay at lower altitudes (or lower L values) was attributed to replenishment of atmospheric losses by inward radial diffusion [Newkirk and Walt, 1968] (see also the review by Walt and Farley [1976, and references therein]).…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%