2001
DOI: 10.1097/00005537-200105000-00010
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Radial Forearm Free Flap Pharyngoesophageal Reconstruction

Abstract: Advantages of radial forearm free flaps for microvascular pharyngoesophageal function include high flap reliability, limited donor site morbidity, larger vascular pedicle caliber, and the ability to achieve good quality tracheoesophageal speech. The swallowing outcome is similar to that achieved after jejunal flap pharyngoesophageal reconstruction. The main disadvantage of this technique relates to a moderately high incidence of pharyngocutaneous fistulas, which contributes to delayed oral intake in affected p… Show more

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
5

Citation Types

3
84
0
7

Year Published

2002
2002
2015
2015

Publication Types

Select...
6
1

Relationship

0
7

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 110 publications
(94 citation statements)
references
References 21 publications
(31 reference statements)
3
84
0
7
Order By: Relevance
“…The radial forearm flap also has a reputation of having a high fistula rate, ranging from 17% to 50%. 15,16,32,33 Our series with the anterolateral thigh flap shows a fistula rate of 9%, which is more comparable to that with the jejunal flap. [11][12][13][14] We believe that an extra layer of closure with the fascia and sometimes the inclusion of a segment of the vastus lateralis muscle, which are unavailable with the radial forearm flap, may have contributed to the lower fistula rate of the anterolateral thigh flap.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 54%
“…The radial forearm flap also has a reputation of having a high fistula rate, ranging from 17% to 50%. 15,16,32,33 Our series with the anterolateral thigh flap shows a fistula rate of 9%, which is more comparable to that with the jejunal flap. [11][12][13][14] We believe that an extra layer of closure with the fascia and sometimes the inclusion of a segment of the vastus lateralis muscle, which are unavailable with the radial forearm flap, may have contributed to the lower fistula rate of the anterolateral thigh flap.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 54%
“…Reports of speech outcomes following radial forearm free flaps have been consistently good. 32,46 In a study by Scharpf and Esclamado,31 93% of patients were able to rely on tracheoesophageal puncture speech as their main modality of communication. In 1 study, although 63% of patients underwent TEP of the jejunal flap, only 25% of these patients went on to use it consistently for communication.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Perhaps this is the reason that reports of other types of fasciocutaneous reconstructions largely ignore 5,47 or do not expand 5,31,32 on the donor site complications. These studies quote 8% and 20% tendon exposure, respectively, following RFF harvest.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…The tubed free radial forearm flap has also been frequently used for the same indications. [27][28][29] The discussion about the ideal method for reconstruction of the cervical oesophagus is still ongoing. 27,29,30 However, a high success and low complication rate has been reported for both methods.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…27,29,30 However, a high success and low complication rate has been reported for both methods. [22][23][24][25][26][27][28][29] The lateral island trapezius myocutaneous flap, 31 the extended submental island flap, 32 and the pectoralis major myocutaneous flap 33,34 are reported to be alternative methods for cervical oesophageal reconstruction, and might be suitable also in trauma situations. However, the data available on these procedures for the particular indication of post-traumatic oesophageal repair are limited.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%