2015
DOI: 10.1016/j.compstruc.2015.06.006
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Radial integration BEM for dynamic coupled thermoelastic analysis under thermal shock loading

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
3
1
1

Citation Types

0
6
0

Year Published

2017
2017
2023
2023

Publication Types

Select...
7
2
1

Relationship

0
10

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 37 publications
(6 citation statements)
references
References 32 publications
0
6
0
Order By: Relevance
“…In recent years, Gao [15] combined the radial integral method (RIM) with the boundary-element method (BEM) and proposed the radial integral boundary element method (RIBEM), which can convert the domain integrals of any 2D and 3D problems into boundary integrals without the help of any special solutions and differential operators. It is a kind of pure boundary element algorithm without an internal mesh, and it solves the 2D and 3D coupled thermoelastic dynamics problems with thermal shock loading with the RIBEM [16]. So far, the RIBEM has been widely used in the engineering field [17][18][19][20][21].…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…In recent years, Gao [15] combined the radial integral method (RIM) with the boundary-element method (BEM) and proposed the radial integral boundary element method (RIBEM), which can convert the domain integrals of any 2D and 3D problems into boundary integrals without the help of any special solutions and differential operators. It is a kind of pure boundary element algorithm without an internal mesh, and it solves the 2D and 3D coupled thermoelastic dynamics problems with thermal shock loading with the RIBEM [16]. So far, the RIBEM has been widely used in the engineering field [17][18][19][20][21].…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Because numerical methods are of great practical importance in the field of coupled thermomechanics, many reference solutions using different approaches can be found from traditional methods used in commercial codes, to contemporary methods including a large spectrum of meshless approaches (Gao et al , 2015; Hosseini-Tehrani and Eslami, 2000; Sladek et al , 2009, 2006).…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Via incorporating fracture mechanics, many numerical simulations focus on evaluating the thermal stress intensity factors of originally existing fractures, which is essential for predicting the thermal induced fracture propagation. During these numerical investigations, the continuum-based numerical methods, i.e., the finite element method (FEM) [8], the extended finite element method (XFEM) [9], the meshless methods (MMs) [10] and the boundary element methods (BEMs) [11], are generally adopted. However, due to the limited capacities of the continuum-based numerical methods in simulating complex discontinuous geometries as well as the fracture mechanics on treating complex fracture patterns, only simple macroscale thermal fracture problems are studied in these numerical simulations.…”
Section: Basic Formulasmentioning
confidence: 99%