2002
DOI: 10.1093/treephys/22.13.907
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Radial patterns of sap flow in woody stems of dominant and understory species: scaling errors associated with positioning of sensors

Abstract: We studied sap flow in dominant coniferous (Pinus sylvestris L.) and broadleaf (Populus canescens L.) species and in understory species (Prunus serotina Ehrh. and Rhododendron ponticum L.) by the heat field deformation (HFD) method. We attempted to identify possible errors arising during flow integration and scaling from single-point measurements to whole trees. Large systematic errors of -90 to 300% were found when it was assumed that sap flow was uniform over the sapwood depth. Therefore, we recommend that t… Show more

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
1
1
1
1

Citation Types

8
144
0
3

Year Published

2004
2004
2015
2015

Publication Types

Select...
8

Relationship

0
8

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 190 publications
(155 citation statements)
references
References 37 publications
8
144
0
3
Order By: Relevance
“…It is more difficult to obtain figures for the water consumption of the whole tree because the sapwood of poplars can be quite thick [19]. Some authors have even given the relationship between the sapwood area (SWA) and the diameter at breast height (DBH) (cm) as: SWA = 6.39 × DBH 1.25 [28,35].…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…It is more difficult to obtain figures for the water consumption of the whole tree because the sapwood of poplars can be quite thick [19]. Some authors have even given the relationship between the sapwood area (SWA) and the diameter at breast height (DBH) (cm) as: SWA = 6.39 × DBH 1.25 [28,35].…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…On this basis, we expected an overestimation of E C of roughly 11% in the control plot and 3.7% in the treatment plot. Due to the dependence of radial patterns in sap flow on species, tree age, and site history and, therefore, the large variability among reduction factors, we chose to disclose this limitation rather than to assume the applicability of a reduction factor from existing literature that was not specific to our plots [James et al, 2002;Nadezhdina et al, 2002;Phillips et al, 1996;Renninger et al, 2013;Schäfer et al, 2000;Shinohara et al, 2013]. Despite these errors, the roughly 15% difference in transpiration between the control and treatment plots remains significant.…”
Section: Red Oakmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Sensors consisted of a long linear heater and two pairs of thermocouples, of which one was placed symmetrically 1.5 cm up and down from the heater (measured symmetrical temperature difference dT sym ), while the other was placed asymmetrically at a short distance (1.0 cm) on one side of the heater (measured asymmetrical temperature difference dT as ) [21]. Reference ends of the thermocouples were at the same height below the heater.…”
Section: Sap Flow Measurementsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…1, middle panel). Position of the sensor in the stem is shown schematically below IR-image, observed at 15 21 . IR-image, marked by red frame, corresponds to 1 s after cutting.…”
Section: Cutting (Step 1) and Removing (Step 2)mentioning
confidence: 99%