2014
DOI: 10.1371/journal.pone.0102503
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Radial Scars and Subsequent Breast Cancer Risk: A Meta-Analysis

Abstract: BackgroundThe relationship between radial scars and breast cancer is unclear, as the results of different studies are inconsistent. We aim to solve the controversy and assess the breast cancer risk of radial scars.MethodsCase-control or cohort studies about radial scars and breast cancer risk published in PubMed, Web of Science and the Cochrane Library from 2000 to 2013 were searched. Heterogeneity for the eligible data was assessed and a pooled odds ratio (OR) with 95% confidence interval (CI) was calculated.… Show more

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
1

Citation Types

0
1
0

Year Published

2018
2018
2022
2022

Publication Types

Select...
4
2

Relationship

0
6

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 13 publications
(1 citation statement)
references
References 30 publications
0
1
0
Order By: Relevance
“…The previously reported maximum stiffness of papillomas was 100 kPa, 87.7 kPa and 60.6 kPa ( 24 , 31 , 32 ). Another lesion included in the high-risk group is radial scar, which is considered as a benign proliferative lesion, but can be associated with atypia and/or malignancy on histology, and was found to increase the relative risk of breast cancer 1.33 to 2 times ( 33 , 34 ). They are characterized as a central fibroelastic core with radially arranged ducts and lobules ( 9 ).…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…The previously reported maximum stiffness of papillomas was 100 kPa, 87.7 kPa and 60.6 kPa ( 24 , 31 , 32 ). Another lesion included in the high-risk group is radial scar, which is considered as a benign proliferative lesion, but can be associated with atypia and/or malignancy on histology, and was found to increase the relative risk of breast cancer 1.33 to 2 times ( 33 , 34 ). They are characterized as a central fibroelastic core with radially arranged ducts and lobules ( 9 ).…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%