2019
DOI: 10.1051/0004-6361/201935520
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Radial-velocity jitter of stars as a function of observational timescale and stellar age

Abstract: Context. Stars show various amounts of radial-velocity (RV) jitter due to varying stellar activity levels. The typical amount of RV jitter as a function of stellar age and observational timescale has not yet been systematically quantified, although it is often larger than the instrumental precision of modern high-resolution spectrographs used for Doppler planet detection and characterization. Aims. We aim to empirically determine the intrinsic stellar RV variation for mostly G and K dwarf stars on different ti… Show more

Help me understand this report
View preprint versions

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2
1
1

Citation Types

3
11
1

Year Published

2020
2020
2024
2024

Publication Types

Select...
6
3

Relationship

0
9

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 14 publications
(15 citation statements)
references
References 34 publications
3
11
1
Order By: Relevance
“…The membership is confirmed by BANYAN analysis with the updated kinematic parameters. The star has constant RV according to SACY (Elliott et al 2014) and Brems et al (2019), with good agreement between these radial velocity determinations.…”
Section: Idsupporting
confidence: 53%
“…The membership is confirmed by BANYAN analysis with the updated kinematic parameters. The star has constant RV according to SACY (Elliott et al 2014) and Brems et al (2019), with good agreement between these radial velocity determinations.…”
Section: Idsupporting
confidence: 53%
“…The membership is confirmed by BANYAN analysis with the updated kinematic parameters. The star has constant RV according to SACY (Elliott et al 2014) and Brems et al (2019), with good agreement between these RV determinations.…”
Section: Appendix A: Photometric Variability and Rotation Periodsmentioning
confidence: 56%
“…The velocities rule out any companion more massive than ;2 M J , thus also ruling out any possibility of an eclipsing binary at the transit period. The scatter is larger than expected for the uncertainties by ;100m s −1 , most likely due to stellar jitter common in young stars(Brems et al 2019;Tran et al 2021). The residual jitter is still far below the expected variation for a tight eclipsing binary.…”
mentioning
confidence: 65%