2011
DOI: 10.1016/j.adhoc.2011.01.006
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

RadiaLE: A framework for designing and assessing link quality estimators in wireless sensor networks

Abstract: a b s t r a c tStringent cost and energy constraints impose the use of low-cost and low-power radio transceivers in large-scale wireless sensor networks (WSNs). This fact, together with the harsh characteristics of the physical environment, requires a rigorous WSN design. Mechanisms for WSN deployment and topology control, MAC and routing, resource and mobility management, greatly depend on reliable link quality estimators (LQEs). This paper describes the RadiaLE framework, which enables the experimental asses… Show more

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2
1
1
1

Citation Types

0
58
0
2

Year Published

2013
2013
2016
2016

Publication Types

Select...
5
2
2

Relationship

0
9

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 52 publications
(60 citation statements)
references
References 20 publications
0
58
0
2
Order By: Relevance
“…These properties allow a better understanding of the performance of protocols or applications in different environments. Other tools of this category are TRI-DENT [11] and RadiaLE [12]. Similar to IRIS, these tools offer a user interface allowing users to interact with the testing nodes that gather network parameters, to visualize the data packets and to process/analyze the data.…”
Section: Related Workmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…These properties allow a better understanding of the performance of protocols or applications in different environments. Other tools of this category are TRI-DENT [11] and RadiaLE [12]. Similar to IRIS, these tools offer a user interface allowing users to interact with the testing nodes that gather network parameters, to visualize the data packets and to process/analyze the data.…”
Section: Related Workmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…In our study, we use LQI as the indicator of link quality between two nodes. Baccour et al [11] used PDR to classify links into three categories: namely connected (PDR> 90%), transitional (10% < PDR< 90%), and disconnected (PDR< 10%). Based on this, we define the bounds of good links and bad links by two threshold values: LQI Good and LQI Bad , whose values are determined by experiments.…”
Section: A Dynamic Forwarding Delay (Dfd)mentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Existing beaconless routing protocols work on circle transmission range and assume that nodes are within transmission range. However, the vehicular environment is dynamic and wireless links are asymmetric [13]. In this context, we consider link quality between two vehicle nodes as part of dynamic forwarding delay (DFD) [29].…”
Section: Protocol Metricsmentioning
confidence: 99%