1980
DOI: 10.1021/j100463a008
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Radiation chemistry of heavy-particle tracks. 1. General considerations

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
3
1
1

Citation Types

2
60
0

Year Published

1984
1984
2016
2016

Publication Types

Select...
3
3
2

Relationship

0
8

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 127 publications
(62 citation statements)
references
References 3 publications
2
60
0
Order By: Relevance
“…The existence of a "track core" in the radial distribution of dose has been postulated by some authors (Mozumder and Magee, 1966;Magee and Chatterjee, 1980;Chatterjee and Magee, 1980), as connected with the Bohr adiabatic radius (e.g. Brandt and Ritchie, 1974).…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 92%
“…The existence of a "track core" in the radial distribution of dose has been postulated by some authors (Mozumder and Magee, 1966;Magee and Chatterjee, 1980;Chatterjee and Magee, 1980), as connected with the Bohr adiabatic radius (e.g. Brandt and Ritchie, 1974).…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 92%
“…LET /2 00 ( 4) ( 5) Chatterjee and Magee (1980a) and Magee and Chatterjee (1980) have applied this track model to make explicit calculations for the radiation chemistry of water and the Fricke solution system, but this model has not been tested to describe radiobiological effects even though Chatterjee and Tobias (1975) have made some limited attempts.…”
Section: Electromagnetic Interactionsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Two types of radial dose distributions have been available (Kase et al, 2008), where we call them 'Katz type distribution' (Katz & Kobetich, 1969;Kraft et al, 1992) and 'Chatterjee type distribution' (Chatterjee & Schaefer, 1976;Magee & Chatterjee, 1980), respectively in this paper after the name of first developers of these distributions. There is a different feature in the region near the incident ion path between these distributions although this region is the most important to estimate the cell survival (Kase et al, 2008).…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…The paradigms employed in these distributions are the free electron gas (Lindhard & Winther, 1964;Ziegler et al, 2008) and the binary collision models (Katz & Kobetich, 1969;Kraft et al, 1992), respectively. In the Chatterjee type distribution (Chatterjee & Schaefer, 1976;Magee & Chatterjee, 1980) where the free electron gas model is employed, the electric field due to the induced polarization produces plasma oscillation that enhances the radial dose. However, in this model, the ionization energy of a molecule in the target is ignored.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
See 1 more Smart Citation