2017
DOI: 10.1016/j.ijcard.2017.03.031
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Radiation dose among different cardiac and vascular invasive procedures: The RODEO study

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
5

Citation Types

0
14
0

Year Published

2018
2018
2022
2022

Publication Types

Select...
8

Relationship

0
8

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 23 publications
(14 citation statements)
references
References 16 publications
0
14
0
Order By: Relevance
“…Procedure times in 2 patients (28 and 29 min) were slightly longer than those previously reported for simple lesion R-PCI, but still within the range of normal variability. Patient radiation exposure from fluoroscopic imaging was similar to or below that observed for manual PCI for type A lesions [12], [13], [14]. The patients did not report any symptoms during the procedure nor did they express any subjective lack of confidence in the operator or procedure.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 65%
“…Procedure times in 2 patients (28 and 29 min) were slightly longer than those previously reported for simple lesion R-PCI, but still within the range of normal variability. Patient radiation exposure from fluoroscopic imaging was similar to or below that observed for manual PCI for type A lesions [12], [13], [14]. The patients did not report any symptoms during the procedure nor did they express any subjective lack of confidence in the operator or procedure.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 65%
“…Another limitation is that the LAWT method depends on contrast‐enhanced MDCT acquisition, which is contraindicated in patients with severe kidney failure, needs special preparation in patients with contrast medium allergy, and implies radiation exposure. Nevertheless, fluoroscopic requirements for the presented method are lower than what has been reported on multicenter international registries 22 and what has been found on recent prospective trials 23 . Therefore, even though the need for a MDCT might imply additional radiation exposure, the overall radiation dose administered is still reasonable.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 79%
“…2,4 Additionally, the same patient may often require repeated cardiac catheterization procedures that further increase the radiation exposure and risk. 36 Pantos et al 6 reviewed doses to adult patients from 72 relevant published studies in international scientific literature. Published results indicated that patients' radiation doses vary widely among different cardiac catheterization procedures and even among equivalent studies.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…35,37 Establishing local benchmark radiation dose data are essential for assessing the impact of any quality improvement initiatives for radiation dose optimization. [36][37][38][39][40][41][42][43][44][45][46][47] The International Commission on Radiological Protection (ICRP) does not give dose limits for patients undergoing medical diagnostic exposures, but requires adherence to the principle of justification and optimization by comparing patient doses with diagnostic reference levels (DRLs) for common procedures. 4 DRL is used in medical imaging using ionizing radiation as a guide to whether, under routine conditions, a patient dose from a specific procedure is unusually high or low for that procedure.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%