2023
DOI: 10.1002/mp.16211
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Radiation dose estimates based on Monte Carlo simulation for spiral breast computed tomography imaging in a large cohort of patients

Abstract: Background: Spiral breast computed tomography (BCT) equipped with a photon-counting detector (PCD) is a new radiological modality allowing for the compression-free acquisition of high-resolution 3-D datasets of the breast.Optimized dose exposu04170/re setups according to breast size were previously proposed but could not effectively be applied in a clinical environment due to ambiguity in measuring breast size.Purpose: This study aims to report the standard radiation dose values in a large cohort of patients e… Show more

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
3
1
1

Citation Types

0
9
0

Year Published

2023
2023
2024
2024

Publication Types

Select...
5

Relationship

0
5

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 7 publications
(9 citation statements)
references
References 34 publications
0
9
0
Order By: Relevance
“…gCTD is also more computationally efficient (by a factor 10 2 ) with respect to the gMCDRR code of Qin et al (2022) written for cone-beam CT scatter correction, which run on the same hardware GPU platform. Using a single NVIDIA Quadro P5000 GPU card and the ImpactMC commercial MC dose simulation software, Shim et al (2023) report a computation speed equal to 1.1-2.6 × 10 7 primary photons s -1 for their simulations on patient-derived anthropomorphic breast phantoms, which is a performance two orders of magnitude worse than in our study. In their paper, Shim et al (2023) report a maximum statistical uncertainty of 1% when launching 2 × 10 7 photons per projection with 2000 projections per rotation (i.e., 4 × 10 10 photons in each virtual scan), against about 4 × 10 12 photons launched in each virtual scan of this study (table 2).…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 53%
See 4 more Smart Citations
“…gCTD is also more computationally efficient (by a factor 10 2 ) with respect to the gMCDRR code of Qin et al (2022) written for cone-beam CT scatter correction, which run on the same hardware GPU platform. Using a single NVIDIA Quadro P5000 GPU card and the ImpactMC commercial MC dose simulation software, Shim et al (2023) report a computation speed equal to 1.1-2.6 × 10 7 primary photons s -1 for their simulations on patient-derived anthropomorphic breast phantoms, which is a performance two orders of magnitude worse than in our study. In their paper, Shim et al (2023) report a maximum statistical uncertainty of 1% when launching 2 × 10 7 photons per projection with 2000 projections per rotation (i.e., 4 × 10 10 photons in each virtual scan), against about 4 × 10 12 photons launched in each virtual scan of this study (table 2).…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 53%
“…Using a single NVIDIA Quadro P5000 GPU card and the ImpactMC commercial MC dose simulation software, Shim et al (2023) report a computation speed equal to 1.1-2.6 × 10 7 primary photons s -1 for their simulations on patient-derived anthropomorphic breast phantoms, which is a performance two orders of magnitude worse than in our study. In their paper, Shim et al (2023) report a maximum statistical uncertainty of 1% when launching 2 × 10 7 photons per projection with 2000 projections per rotation (i.e., 4 × 10 10 photons in each virtual scan), against about 4 × 10 12 photons launched in each virtual scan of this study (table 2). Hence, by reducing by two orders of magnitude the number of photons launched in each simulation, the fast VCT-BREAST tool can produce 3D dose maps within less than 1 min of GPU time.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 53%
See 3 more Smart Citations