1996
DOI: 10.2172/238511
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Radiation dose estimates for radiopharmaceuticals

Abstract: T a b l e s of r a d i a t i o n dose e s t i m a t e s based on t h e Cristy-Eckerman a d u l t male phantom are provided for a number of radiopharmaceuticals commonly used i n n u c l e a r medicine. Radiation dose e s t i m a t e s are l i s t e d for a l l major source organs, and s e v e r a l o t h e r organs of i n t e r e s t . The dose estimates were c a l c u l a t e d using t h e MIRD Technique as implemented i n t h e MIRDOSE3 computer code, developed by t h e Oak Ridge I n s t i t u t e f o r Scie… Show more

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2
2
1

Citation Types

2
13
0
1

Year Published

2006
2006
2022
2022

Publication Types

Select...
6
2
1

Relationship

0
9

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 53 publications
(16 citation statements)
references
References 0 publications
2
13
0
1
Order By: Relevance
“…The ICRP Task Group believes that the data of Thomas et al (7) are sound and intends to revise the ICRP dose estimates in a future publication. The dose estimates for 201 Tl in the dosimetry compendium published by RIDIC (8) were based on the data of Krahwinkel et al (2) and Thomas et al (7) for doses to the testes (obtained before publication) and on the assumption of radiocontaminant levels similar to those in the study of Thomas et al; therefore, they agreed well with the dose estimates of Thomas et al Table 1 shows the dosimetry proposed by the 3 groups. Table 2 shows the contributions of the radiocontaminants to the total dose, calculated from the data of Thomas et al (7).…”
Section: Tl-chloridesupporting
confidence: 68%
“…The ICRP Task Group believes that the data of Thomas et al (7) are sound and intends to revise the ICRP dose estimates in a future publication. The dose estimates for 201 Tl in the dosimetry compendium published by RIDIC (8) were based on the data of Krahwinkel et al (2) and Thomas et al (7) for doses to the testes (obtained before publication) and on the assumption of radiocontaminant levels similar to those in the study of Thomas et al; therefore, they agreed well with the dose estimates of Thomas et al Table 1 shows the dosimetry proposed by the 3 groups. Table 2 shows the contributions of the radiocontaminants to the total dose, calculated from the data of Thomas et al (7).…”
Section: Tl-chloridesupporting
confidence: 68%
“…The absorbed doses in urinary bladder, liver, and kidneys were higher for 18 F-RGD-K5 than for 18 F-FDG. A large fraction of 18 F-RGD-K5 (;44% in 2.5 h) and 18 F-HX4 (;45% in 3.5 h) was excreted through the urinary system, Table 6 compares WB radiation dose and effective dose from 18 F-RGD-K5 with doses from a few 18 F-based radiopharmaceuticals (14,16,17). As shown in these tables, the radiation dose from 18 F-RGD-K5 is comparable to that from other 18 F-based imaging agents.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…The patient-effective and organ-absorbed radiation doses for the sestamibi scans were derived from the US Nuclear Regulatory Commission NUREG/CR-6345 publication. 14 This document contains radiation dose estimates for a number of radiopharmaceuticals commonly used in nuclear medicine. Dose estimates are calculated using the Medical Internal Radiation Dose (MIRD) technique.…”
Section: Methodsmentioning
confidence: 99%