Radiation Dose From Medical Imaging: A Primer for Emergency Physicians

Abstract

IntroductionMedical imaging now accounts for most of the US population's exposure to ionizing radiation. A substantial proportion of this medical imaging is ordered in the emergency setting. We aim to provide a general overview of radiation dose from medical imaging with a focus on computed tomography, as well as a literature review of recent efforts to decrease unnecessary radiation exposure to patients in the emergency department setting.MethodsWe conducted a literature review through calendar year 2010 for all published articles pertaining to the emergency department and radiation exposure.ResultsThe benefits of imaging usually outweigh the risks of eventual radiation-induced cancer in most clinical scenarios encountered by emergency physicians. However, our literature review identified 3 specific clinical situations in the general adult population in which the lifetime risks of cancer may outweigh the benefits to the patient: rule out pulmonary embolism, flank pain, and recurrent abdominal pain in inflammatory bowel disease. For these specific clinical scenarios, a physician-patient discussion about such risks and benefits may be warranted.ConclusionEmergency physicians, now at the front line of patients' exposure to ionizing radiation, should have a general understanding of the magnitude of radiation dose from advanced medical imaging procedures and their associated risks. Future areas of research should include the development of protocols and guidelines that limit unnecessary patient radiation exposure.

The effect of well-characterized, very low-dose x-ray radiation on fibroblasts

“…Ionizing x-ray radiation exposure can cause DNA damage and the development of cancer, yet people are constantly exposed to x-rays and other forms of radiation from many different sources [ 1 ]. These sources include naturally occurring background radiation, cosmic radiation during space travel, diagnostic medical imaging such as x-rays and CT scans, radiation therapy for cancer treatment, and even from disaster areas like Fukushima [ 1 – 7 ]. Since the 1980’s, medical imaging has become an integral part of healthcare diagnostics, exposing patients to radiation at ever-increasing frequencies [ 3 , 8 ].…”

Eliminating the stigma: A systematic review of the health effects of low-dose radiation within the diagnostic imaging department and its implications for the future of medical radiation

“…Jones et al 2012 19 Literature review The benefits of imaging usually outweigh the risks of eventual radiationinduced cancer in most clinical scenarios encountered by emergency physicians.…”

A conceptual model of emergency physician decision making for head computed tomography in mild head injury

“…Although some EPs may be reluctant to engage patients in these decisions for fear that patients might refuse imaging due to concern of developing cancer, this has not been borne out in studies [10, 64, 65]. A greater concern may be whether the busy EP has time to engage in a protracted discussion each time a head CT is being contemplated.…”