2010
DOI: 10.1148/radiol.10092397
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Radiation Dose to the Conceptus from Multidetector CT during Early Gestation: A Method That Allows for Variations in Maternal Body Size and Conceptus Position

Abstract: Purpose:To develop a method for estimating the radiation dose to the conceptus from multidetector computed tomography (CT) of the abdomen and pelvis in pregnant patients during the fi rst 7 weeks of gestation. Materials and Methods:This study was approved by the institutional review board and informed consent was obtained. A CT simulation software package was used to (a) develop voxelized models on the basis of image data from 117 nonpregnant patients who underwent abdominal and pelvic multidetector CT and (b)… Show more

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
3
1

Citation Types

2
24
1

Year Published

2013
2013
2023
2023

Publication Types

Select...
5
1

Relationship

0
6

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 40 publications
(27 citation statements)
references
References 15 publications
2
24
1
Order By: Relevance
“…Furthermore, DAP-normalised doses show a decrease as BMI increases. Damilakis found a statistically significant relationship between normalised foetal dose and maternal body size and between normalised foetal dose and skin-to-foetal distance [32].…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 97%
See 1 more Smart Citation
“…Furthermore, DAP-normalised doses show a decrease as BMI increases. Damilakis found a statistically significant relationship between normalised foetal dose and maternal body size and between normalised foetal dose and skin-to-foetal distance [32].…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 97%
“…Mathematical phantoms simulating pregnancy during all trimesters of gestation have been used with the Monte Carlo N-particle program MCNP to estimate foetal dose [29]. In the later stages of pregnancy and especially during the 3rd trimester, foetal size and depth become crucial in estimating foetal dose [30][31][32]. It has been shown [30] that in the second and third trimester, the normalised conceptus dose may be 2.3 and 3.3 times greater, respectively, in comparison with that of the first trimester.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…These phantoms are usually cut into sections, which contain holes for the position of dosimeters. [26][27][28][29] More so, recent studies have estimated organ dose through the use of cadavers (postmortem studies). [30,31] The aim of this study was to first estimate each organ mean dose in: head (brain and eye lens), chest (lungs, breast, thyroid and heart), abdomen (stomach and liver) and pelvis (bladder and uterus), using the imPACT dose simulation software, to compare similar organ dose among the 7 CT units if they vary significantly, to determine range of percentage mean dose difference for this study and related study and to generally compare mean organ doses with international studies who used similar software and other methods (TLD and postmortem studies).…”
mentioning
confidence: 99%
“…On the contrary, a possible miscentring of the pregnant patient few centimeters (3 cm) above the gantry isocenter delivers roughly the same radiation dose to the conceptus compared to that at the isocenter with improved image quality. Several methods have been reported on the estimation of conceptus radiation dose in pregnant patients who are refered for CT examinations [7][8][9][10][11][12][13]. In these methods, pregnant patients are assumed to be correctly positioned at the isocenter.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…The estimation of conceptus radiation dose is essential to determine radiogenic risks to the unborn child and inform the expectant mother [5,6]. Several studies have been published on conceptus radiation dose from CT examinations during pregnancy [7][8][9][10][11][12][13]. For the pregnant patient who needs CT, the most important element is to optimize the examination and keep conceptus radiation dose as low as reasonably achievable.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%