2018
DOI: 10.3174/ajnr.a5568
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Radiation Dosimetry of 3D Rotational Neuroangiography and 2D-DSA in Children

Abstract: In pediatric neuroangiography, the effective dose for 3D rotational angiography can be significantly lower than for 2D-biplane DSA and can be an essential adjunct in the evaluation of neurovascular lesions. Additionally, available 3D rotational angiography protocols have significant room to be tailored for effectiveness and dose optimization, depending on the clinical question.

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2
1
1
1

Citation Types

0
9
0

Year Published

2018
2018
2024
2024

Publication Types

Select...
10

Relationship

1
9

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 14 publications
(9 citation statements)
references
References 25 publications
0
9
0
Order By: Relevance
“…Regarding radiation exposure, evidence suggests that the radiation exposure is lower for 3DRA than it is for a series of DSA or CTA images; the mean effective doses are roughly 0.9 mSv for a single DSA acquisition, 2.1-3.4 mSv for a series of DSA acquisitions, 3-29 mSv for suspected-stroke CTA, and 0.2-1.3 mSv for 3DRA. 5,8,[31][32][33]35 As for HiRes-XperCT or cone-beam CTA, the speculated radiation exposure is roughly three times greater than that for 3DRA and two times greater than that for a single acquisition of biplane DSA. 28 Our current angiography protocol entails a single acquisition of biplane DSA followed by RA, which mainly includes 3DRA, with the occasional use of HiRes-XperCT for cases with small, faint niduses; thus, it could be speculated that our protocol delivers an equivalent or a lower radiation dose than multiple magnified DSA acquisitions to obtain the appropriate images.…”
Section: Figmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Regarding radiation exposure, evidence suggests that the radiation exposure is lower for 3DRA than it is for a series of DSA or CTA images; the mean effective doses are roughly 0.9 mSv for a single DSA acquisition, 2.1-3.4 mSv for a series of DSA acquisitions, 3-29 mSv for suspected-stroke CTA, and 0.2-1.3 mSv for 3DRA. 5,8,[31][32][33]35 As for HiRes-XperCT or cone-beam CTA, the speculated radiation exposure is roughly three times greater than that for 3DRA and two times greater than that for a single acquisition of biplane DSA. 28 Our current angiography protocol entails a single acquisition of biplane DSA followed by RA, which mainly includes 3DRA, with the occasional use of HiRes-XperCT for cases with small, faint niduses; thus, it could be speculated that our protocol delivers an equivalent or a lower radiation dose than multiple magnified DSA acquisitions to obtain the appropriate images.…”
Section: Figmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…In 2010, Cone Beam CT became available and provided satisfactory image guidance for the procedure. It eventually replaced CT fluoroscopy in 2016 due to its adequate performance, ease of use and recognized radiation dose reduction, as has been demonstrated in the literature [19,20]. The corticosteroid currently used is triamcinolone hexacetonide as studies have shown that it is more effective than hydrocortisone succinate and triamcinolone acetonide in reducing pain and joint inflammation [21,22].…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…The ability to perform 3DRA with low radiation doses while maintaining high spatial and contrast resolution reconstructions has also been demonstrated. 32 This allows the use of 3DRA-MR imaging fusion to confidently identify or exclude small vascular nidi or dysplastic structures that are characteristic of bAVM recurrence in children. This is especially relevant for false-positive MR imaging studies because MR imaging enhancement, though highly sensitive for vascular structures, is of questionable significance in the posttreatment setting, as described above.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%