1976
DOI: 10.1016/0022-4073(76)90067-4
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Radiation emission coefficients for sulfur hexafluoride arc plasmas

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2
1
1

Citation Types

8
123
1
2

Year Published

1978
1978
2015
2015

Publication Types

Select...
7
2

Relationship

0
9

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 197 publications
(134 citation statements)
references
References 15 publications
8
123
1
2
Order By: Relevance
“…This method is of interest because the complicated calculation of the net emission (net meaning emission minus absorption, which is mathematically represented by the divergence of the radiative flux) integrated over all the spectrum (VUV, UV, visible and IR parts) is previously calculated for isothermal conditions and then injected in the energy conservation equation by a simple source term. This NEC was initially proposed by Lowke [1] and first calculated for SF 6 by Liebermann and Lowke [2]. Since this pioneer work, other teams have been calculating the NEC for SF 6 [3][4] and several works demonstrated the interest in and accuracy of this coefficient for calculating the temperature field in arcs [5] introducing a multiplying factor [6][7].…”
Section: -Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…This method is of interest because the complicated calculation of the net emission (net meaning emission minus absorption, which is mathematically represented by the divergence of the radiative flux) integrated over all the spectrum (VUV, UV, visible and IR parts) is previously calculated for isothermal conditions and then injected in the energy conservation equation by a simple source term. This NEC was initially proposed by Lowke [1] and first calculated for SF 6 by Liebermann and Lowke [2]. Since this pioneer work, other teams have been calculating the NEC for SF 6 [3][4] and several works demonstrated the interest in and accuracy of this coefficient for calculating the temperature field in arcs [5] introducing a multiplying factor [6][7].…”
Section: -Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…This closely represents the MAC approximation, however it is not the most accurate approximation of the continuum radiation which is usually used for the selection of MAC band boundaries [14]. The more accurate description was provided by Liebermann and Lowke [15], suggesting the absorption decays with a factor of 1=m 3 from some absorption edge value.…”
Section: Testmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Because a free electron can assume non-quantized kinetic energies, its recombination with an ion will result in continuum radiation. The excess energy of an electron with velocity v e is converted into radiation according to the relation: The photo-ionization cross sections for neutral atoms were calculated by the quantum defect method of Burgess and Seaton [7], the cross sections of photo-ionization of ions were treated using the Coulomb approximation for hydrogen-like species [8].…”
Section: Absorption Properties Of Plasmamentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Semi-empirical formulas given in [8,9] were used. The line shapes were calculated by convolution of Gaussian and Lorentzian profiles, resulting in a Voigt profile.…”
Section: Absorption Properties Of Plasmamentioning
confidence: 99%