2010
DOI: 10.4314/ijmu.v5i2.56160
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Radiation exposure from diagnostic radiography: an assessment of X-ray beam collimation practice in some Nigerian Hospitals

Abstract: This study was carried out to evaluate the X-ray beam collimation practice, among radiographers, as a measure of radiation protection for patients undergoing radiodiagnostic investigations. Inadequate X-ray beam collimation practice was observed in all the hospitals studied. Light beam misalignment/malfunction, pressure of work and years of experience were identified as major contributory factors. There is therefore need for proper equipment maintenance, employment of adequate number of radiographers and perio… Show more

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
1
1
1
1

Citation Types

1
9
0

Year Published

2016
2016
2023
2023

Publication Types

Select...
7

Relationship

0
7

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 7 publications
(10 citation statements)
references
References 3 publications
1
9
0
Order By: Relevance
“…Moreover, an appropriate field size is a major factor in (mGy) This study IAEA (30) UK (31) JAPAN (32) IRAN (33) IRAN (34) Skull (AP) (20) reported proper field size collimation in only 46% of examinations. Some factors may be involved in the low rate of field size collimation, such as patients' emergency conditions, high staff workload, concerns about missing the diagnostic targets, and technician's neglect (19,20,36) . Some specific capabilities of digital radiography systems, such as electronic collimation of field size, have caused some challenges.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
See 1 more Smart Citation
“…Moreover, an appropriate field size is a major factor in (mGy) This study IAEA (30) UK (31) JAPAN (32) IRAN (33) IRAN (34) Skull (AP) (20) reported proper field size collimation in only 46% of examinations. Some factors may be involved in the low rate of field size collimation, such as patients' emergency conditions, high staff workload, concerns about missing the diagnostic targets, and technician's neglect (19,20,36) . Some specific capabilities of digital radiography systems, such as electronic collimation of field size, have caused some challenges.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Also, radiation field size, which is an essential factor in scattered radiation, image quality, and patient dose, should be limited to the target area (18) . According to some studies, due to many factors, such as high workload or convenience, field size localization 938 is not properly adjusted (19,20) . On the other hand, electronic collimation in digital systems allows operators to use this capability rather than adjust the field size manually; therefore, the patient dose may increase by applying field sizes greater than needed (21,22) .…”
mentioning
confidence: 99%
“…32 Gonad shielding, however, was found to increase the dose area product when used for female pelvis X-rays. 33 Studies conducted in Yobe, Nigeria, 34 Khuzestan-Iran, Ahvaz-Iran, 35 Saudi Arabia, 36 Australia 37 and South Africa 38 show evidence of poor collimation practices. An observational study from the United Kingdom found that radiographers collimated/cropped images at the post-processing stage with collimation/cropping ranging from 1 cm to 5 cm.…”
Section: P11mentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Inadequate collimation is responsible for the highest unnecessary integral dose to patients in diagnostic radiology 7 . It has been reported that variations in gonadal dose are presumably due to variations in collimation 8 .…”
Section: Sirmentioning
confidence: 99%