2011
DOI: 10.1007/s10546-010-9580-2
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Radiation Fog. Part I: Observations of Stability and Drop Size Distributions

Abstract: Data from several cases of radiation fog occurring at the Met Office field site at Cardington, Bedfordshire, UK have been analyzed with a view to elucidating the typical evolution in its static stability from formation to dissipation. Typically the early stages of radiation fog are characterized by a stable thermal profile and a relatively shallow depth. However, when the fog reached approximately 100 m depth it was observed to become optically thick (to longwave radiation), with a subsequent change over sever… Show more

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
1
1
1
1

Citation Types

19
96
0

Year Published

2012
2012
2024
2024

Publication Types

Select...
7
2

Relationship

1
8

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 88 publications
(115 citation statements)
references
References 44 publications
19
96
0
Order By: Relevance
“…droplet activation and a rise the observed and LES cloud droplet numbers . Fig 9(b) shows a small secondary peak in the size spectra around 10 µm developing due to the increasing turbulence, and the evolution of the spectra and cloud droplet numbers after this point is very similar to that already reported in Price (2011) and Tonttila et al (2017), hence we do not focus on it here. The well-mixed layer continues to grow throughout the night, until the entire fog layer is well-mixed and turbulent by 08 UTC.…”
Section: Les Analysis 10supporting
confidence: 61%
See 1 more Smart Citation
“…droplet activation and a rise the observed and LES cloud droplet numbers . Fig 9(b) shows a small secondary peak in the size spectra around 10 µm developing due to the increasing turbulence, and the evolution of the spectra and cloud droplet numbers after this point is very similar to that already reported in Price (2011) and Tonttila et al (2017), hence we do not focus on it here. The well-mixed layer continues to grow throughout the night, until the entire fog layer is well-mixed and turbulent by 08 UTC.…”
Section: Les Analysis 10supporting
confidence: 61%
“…for the droplet concentration at the lowest model level, tapering up to a value determined by the concentration of aerosol (Osborne et al, 2014) at 150 m. This tapering process is a pragmatic attempt at representing the fact that cloud drop numbers in fog tend to be lower than those 15 observed higher up in the atmosphere (Gultepe et al, 2009;Price, 2011), however it appears that it is failing to represent some key features. The drop numbers in fog are believed to be low because, despite the abundance of aerosol from which to form cloud droplets near the surface, the lack of any appreciable updrafts in the near surface stable boundary layer results in weak supersaturations.…”
mentioning
confidence: 99%
“…However, accurate and general relationships cannot be found from Z alone, since Z is most sensitive to the largest droplets, which may only weakly impact LWC and r eff . As the shape of the DSD varies significantly during and between fog events (Boers et al, 2012;Gultepe et al, 2007;Price, 2011), retrievals of LWC and r eff using Z alone will only be rough estimates, even in the absence of drizzle. A synergy with the more reliable LWP from MWR is therefore used in several methods in the literature, with varying approaches for vertically distributing this liquid water inside the cloud.…”
Section: Appendix B: Estimation Of Vertical Profiles Of Microphysicalmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…In particular, the model introduced in this work accurately preserves the characteristics of the aerosol size distribution both inside and outside of clouds, making it ideal for studying the impact of removal processes, cloud processing and evaporation on the particle size distribution, as well as the associated feedbacks on cloud properties, precipitation formation and boundary layer dynamics. The model is evaluated by experimenting on two very different cases: one comprising marine stratocumulus clouds based on the DYCOMS-II dataset (Stevens et al, 2003), and another focusing on a radiation fog event based on the findings of (Porson et al, 2011;Price, 2011). The results are compared with earlier studies and models with a simple bulk microphysics scheme, and similarities and differences are analysed and explained in detail.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%