2016
DOI: 10.1063/1.4959071
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Radiation forces and torque on a rigid elliptical cylinder in acoustical plane progressive and (quasi)standing waves with arbitrary incidence

Abstract: A B S T R A C TThe aim of this communication is to correct inaccurate statements presented in a Commentary on the paper titled: "Radiation forces and torque on a rigid elliptical cylinder in acoustical plane progressive and (quasi)standing waves with arbitrary incidence" [Phys. Fluids 28, 077104 (2016)].

Help me understand this report
View preprint versions

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
3
2

Citation Types

0
20
0

Year Published

2017
2017
2024
2024

Publication Types

Select...
8

Relationship

1
7

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 45 publications
(20 citation statements)
references
References 73 publications
0
20
0
Order By: Relevance
“…where n and A θ are, respectively, the normal vector and the surface-shape function of the object of arbitrary geometry. Similar boundary conditions were previously used for the case of a rigid (sound-impenetrable) elliptical cylindrical particle in quasi-Gaussian cylindrically-focused beams [39] and plane waves [38,40,42,43]. Moreover, at the planar rigid boundary where r=r′ and θ′=(π −θ), the Neumann boundary condition (used previously for a rigid sphere near a rigid flat surface [46]) still holds, such that, r t r t n n , , , , 0.…”
Section: Multiple Scattering Formalismmentioning
confidence: 87%
See 1 more Smart Citation
“…where n and A θ are, respectively, the normal vector and the surface-shape function of the object of arbitrary geometry. Similar boundary conditions were previously used for the case of a rigid (sound-impenetrable) elliptical cylindrical particle in quasi-Gaussian cylindrically-focused beams [39] and plane waves [38,40,42,43]. Moreover, at the planar rigid boundary where r=r′ and θ′=(π −θ), the Neumann boundary condition (used previously for a rigid sphere near a rigid flat surface [46]) still holds, such that, r t r t n n , , , , 0.…”
Section: Multiple Scattering Formalismmentioning
confidence: 87%
“…Similar expressions using the mathematical basis of cylindrical wave functions were previously utilized in elastic wave [34][35][36] and acoustic scattering [37][38][39][40] based on the formalism of the T-matrix [41]. (Related discussions can be also found in [39,40,[42][43][44][45]).…”
Section: Multiple Scattering Formalismmentioning
confidence: 95%
“…When the cylinder geometrical cross-section deviates from the circular shape, the method has been proven useful to determine the internal and external EM fields for irregularly shaped particles in laser-particle interactions [5]. Moreover, other investigations related to the acoustical scattering, radiation force and torque on elliptical particles [6][7][8][9][10] were developed. Nonetheless, in certain cases, multiple particles are subjected to an incident illuminating field such that interparticle forces causing optical binding effects can arise, which do not exist in the single object case.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Similar PWSEs using the mathematical basis of cylindrical wave functions have been used previously in elastic wave [35][36][37] and acoustic scattering [38][39][40][41][42] based on the Tmatrix formalism [43] for objects such as squares, ellipses and other complex shapes. (See also the related discussions in [11,29,30,41,42,44,45]. )…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…are the total and internal velocity potentials, respectively, and ρ and ρ f are the mass densities of the host fluid medium and fluid particle, respectively. The parameters n and A θ are the normal vector and the surface shape function of the particle of arbitrary geometry [41,42,44,45], respectively.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%