1998
DOI: 10.1159/000332093
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Radiation-Induced Acute Immediate Nuclear Abnormalities in Oral Cancer Cells

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2
2
1

Citation Types

0
13
0
1

Year Published

2002
2002
2012
2012

Publication Types

Select...
5
3

Relationship

0
8

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 25 publications
(14 citation statements)
references
References 13 publications
0
13
0
1
Order By: Relevance
“…The mitotic catastrophe is generally considered a consequence of premature or improper entry of a cell into mitosis and can be induced by a multitude of DNA-damaging agents including radiation. The mitotic catastrophe is executed by most non-hematopoietic tumor cells in response to ionizing radiation [68] and is frequently observed in experimental tumors following radiotherapy and radioimmunotherapy [69][70][71][72][73]. Mitotic catastrophe is today considered to be the major cell death mechanism by which solid tumors respond to clinical radiotherapy.…”
Section: Radiation-induced Mitotic Catastrophementioning
confidence: 99%
“…The mitotic catastrophe is generally considered a consequence of premature or improper entry of a cell into mitosis and can be induced by a multitude of DNA-damaging agents including radiation. The mitotic catastrophe is executed by most non-hematopoietic tumor cells in response to ionizing radiation [68] and is frequently observed in experimental tumors following radiotherapy and radioimmunotherapy [69][70][71][72][73]. Mitotic catastrophe is today considered to be the major cell death mechanism by which solid tumors respond to clinical radiotherapy.…”
Section: Radiation-induced Mitotic Catastrophementioning
confidence: 99%
“…Nuclear morphologic changes in U251MG or D54MG cells were evaluated using Giemsa staining, as described elsewhere (Bhattathiri et al, 1998a, b;Bhattathiri, 2001). U251MG and D54MG cells were irradiated with a dose of 4 Gy, and were infected with Axmock, Ax-hp16 or Ax-p21 as described above.…”
Section: Evaluation Of Nuclear Morphologymentioning
confidence: 99%
“…The frequency of micronucleated, nuclear budded, binucleated and multinucleated tumour cells was evaluated. The criteria for identification of these cells are described elsewhere (Bhattathiri et al, 1998a, b;Bhattathiri, 2001). Briefly, micronucleated cells contain small round bodies of nuclear material within the cytoplasm, separate from the main nucleus (the cells indicated with one arrow in Figure 4D and E).…”
Section: Evaluation Of Nuclear Morphologymentioning
confidence: 99%
“…The most important data of 4 papers in Table 2 are presented concerning the studied cells with no sign of pathology [23][24][25][26] presented (Table 3) [27][28][29][30]. Both in normal and tumor cells a significant increase of MN was observed due to radiation.…”
Section: The Data Concerning Possibility To Use Micronuclei (Mn) Levementioning
confidence: 99%
“…In 4 papers MN level was studied in cervix and oral mucosa tumor cells (Table 3) [24,[27][28][29][30]. In some cases MN frequencies in the tumor cells were higher than in the normal mucosa cells (e. g., 15 ‰ [27] and 11 ‰ [28] compared with the healthy subjects from India -0.7-4.0 ‰ [32]).…”
Section: The Data Concerning Possibility To Use Micronuclei (Mn) Levementioning
confidence: 99%