1999
DOI: 10.1080/095530099140582
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Radiation-induced breakpoint misrejoining in human chromosomes: random or non-random?

Abstract: There is an approximately linear proportionality between autosomal DNA content and observed breakpoint number, suggesting that subsets of autosomes can be used to estimate accurately the overall genomic frequency of misrejoined breakpoints contingent upon a carefully selected subset. However, this conclusion may not apply to the sex chromosomes. The results also support the influence of chromatin organization and/or preferential DNA repair/misrejoining on the distribution of induced breakpoints. However, these… Show more

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
3
1

Citation Types

3
18
0

Year Published

2002
2002
2010
2010

Publication Types

Select...
6
2

Relationship

0
8

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 48 publications
(21 citation statements)
references
References 40 publications
3
18
0
Order By: Relevance
“…''Whole genome equivalent'' refers to the correction factor developed by Lucas et al (38) that is applied to stable aberration frequencies detected by single-color FISH to adjust for those aberrations occurring in chromosomes that are not ''painted'' by the FISH probes and those aberrations involving chromosomes painted with the same color. Application of the correction factor is based on the assumption that the probability of a break(s) occurring in any particular chromosome is dependent on its DNA content; that is, larger chromosomes are subject to more breaks (37,38). Whole genome equivalents for this study were determined by adapting the correction developed by Lucas et al (38) to include the additional paint color used in this study rather than the single-color FISH used by Lucas et al:…”
Section: Exposure Assessmentmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…''Whole genome equivalent'' refers to the correction factor developed by Lucas et al (38) that is applied to stable aberration frequencies detected by single-color FISH to adjust for those aberrations occurring in chromosomes that are not ''painted'' by the FISH probes and those aberrations involving chromosomes painted with the same color. Application of the correction factor is based on the assumption that the probability of a break(s) occurring in any particular chromosome is dependent on its DNA content; that is, larger chromosomes are subject to more breaks (37,38). Whole genome equivalents for this study were determined by adapting the correction developed by Lucas et al (38) to include the additional paint color used in this study rather than the single-color FISH used by Lucas et al:…”
Section: Exposure Assessmentmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…It was based on the theory that the probability of an aberrant event occurring in any particular chromosome is determined by its DNA content [Lucas et al, 1992;Tucker et al, 1993]. This theory has been substantiated in some radiation and chromosome aberration studies that have demonstrated a linear relationship between DNA content and breakpoints, i.e., larger chromosomes are subject to more breaks [Puerto et al, 1999b;Johnson et al, 1999;Sachs et al, 2000]. However, multiple studies have demonstrated that chromosome aberrations induced with radiation and chemicals are not randomly distributed by chromosome size [Knehr et al, 1996;Stephan and Pressl, 1997;Barquinero et al, 1998;Smith et al, 1998;Wu et al, 1998;Zhang et al, 1998aZhang et al, ,b, 2005Eastmond et al, 2001;Verdorfer et al, 2001;Zhu et al, 2002;Beskid et al, 2006].…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Until the development of FISH, unstable aberrations, detected by Giemsa-staining, were used as an indicator of levels of chromosome breakage. Chromosome breakage was used as a surrogate endpoint for the direct measurement of stable aberrations [Johnson et al, 1998[Johnson et al, , 1999Mitelman, 2000].…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…PTC1 and PTC3 rearrangements have also been induced in vitro and in vivo by irradiation of tumor cell lines and fetal thyroid tissue that had previously been transplanted into severe combined immunodeficient (SCID) mice (15)(16)(17). Several studies suggest that different kinds of radiation (UVA and ionizing radiation) induce a nonrandom distribution of the DNA lesions across the whole genome (18,19).…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%