2018
DOI: 10.1093/mnras/sty1217
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Radiation pressure in super star cluster formation

Abstract: The physics of star formation at its extreme, in the nuclei of the densest and the most massive star clusters in the universe-potential massive black hole nurseries-has for decades eluded scrutiny. Spectroscopy of these systems has been scarce, whereas theoretical arguments suggest that radiation pressure on dust grains somehow inhibits star formation. Here, we harness an accelerated Monte Carlo radiation transport scheme to report a radiation hydrodynamical simulation of super star cluster formation in turbul… Show more

Help me understand this report
View preprint versions

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
1
1
1
1

Citation Types

0
23
0

Year Published

2018
2018
2023
2023

Publication Types

Select...
10

Relationship

0
10

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 37 publications
(23 citation statements)
references
References 98 publications
0
23
0
Order By: Relevance
“…The adaptive ray tracing calculates E i at every cell and keeps track of Q esc,i 3 These clouds are optically thick to UV radiation (Σ 0 κ −1 d,UV ∼ 10 M pc −2 ) but optically thin to dust-reprocessed IR radiation (Σ 0 κ −1 d,IR ∼ 10 3 M pc −2 ). The pressure from trapped IR radiation is likely to play a dominant role only for clouds in extremely high-surface density environments (e.g., Skinner & Ostriker 2015;Tsang & Milosavljević 2018). explicitly, allowing us to calculate the hydrogen absorption fraction, dust absorption fraction, and escape fraction defined as…”
Section: Absorption and Escape Fractions Of Radiationmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…The adaptive ray tracing calculates E i at every cell and keeps track of Q esc,i 3 These clouds are optically thick to UV radiation (Σ 0 κ −1 d,UV ∼ 10 M pc −2 ) but optically thin to dust-reprocessed IR radiation (Σ 0 κ −1 d,IR ∼ 10 3 M pc −2 ). The pressure from trapped IR radiation is likely to play a dominant role only for clouds in extremely high-surface density environments (e.g., Skinner & Ostriker 2015;Tsang & Milosavljević 2018). explicitly, allowing us to calculate the hydrogen absorption fraction, dust absorption fraction, and escape fraction defined as…”
Section: Absorption and Escape Fractions Of Radiationmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…a few times Solar). This latter regime was studied by Tsang & Milosavljević (2018) in a 10 7 M turbulent box, where radiation pressure only modestly reduced the star formation efficiency and rate, and did not disperse enough gas to stop star formation completely (helped by the porous gas distribution, in contrast with the Fall et al (2010) model). In short, the relatively low surface density and metallicity of our cloud (as well as the low luminosity) results in radiation pressure being unimportant as a source of feedback as it pertains to gas dispersal.…”
Section: Dispersalmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…The role of feedback in limiting the mass of a cluster is not clear. Ginsburg et al (2016) suggest that feedback has virtually no role and gas exhaustion stops star formation in the cluster, rather than gas expulsion (see also Girichidis et al 2012;Kruijssen 2012;Matzner 2017;Galván-Madrid et al 2017;Tsang & Milosavljević 2018;Silich & Tenorio-Tagle 2018;Cohen et al 2018;Ward & Kruijssen 2018). Also, there is no jump in the mass function of bound clusters at a mass of around 10 3 M ⊙ where ionization feedback suddenly increases as a result of the increasingly likely appearance of O-type stars (Vacca et al 1996).…”
Section: Minimum Pressurementioning
confidence: 99%