1998
DOI: 10.6028/nist.sp.250-44
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Radiation processing dosimetry calibration services and measurement assurance program

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
3
1
1

Citation Types

0
7
0

Year Published

1999
1999
2022
2022

Publication Types

Select...
7

Relationship

0
7

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 7 publications
(7 citation statements)
references
References 0 publications
0
7
0
Order By: Relevance
“…The water surface is set at a scale distance of 53.8 cm. This design differs from the published scheme [ 3 ]. In the published scheme, this irradiation was done in a polystyrene phantom and a scaling theorem was used to correct for differences in photon interaction cross sections between polystyrene and water.…”
Section: Calibration Of Nist Gamma Sourcesmentioning
confidence: 98%
See 2 more Smart Citations
“…The water surface is set at a scale distance of 53.8 cm. This design differs from the published scheme [ 3 ]. In the published scheme, this irradiation was done in a polystyrene phantom and a scaling theorem was used to correct for differences in photon interaction cross sections between polystyrene and water.…”
Section: Calibration Of Nist Gamma Sourcesmentioning
confidence: 98%
“…At NIST, absorbed dose is realized by a water calorimeter in a gamma-ray field produced by a Vertical Beam 60 Co source [ 2 ] with an activity (as of April, 2007) of 48 TBq (1.3 kCi). The technical specifications for this source were described previously [ 3 ]. Because the dose rate for this source is relatively low, a high-dose-rate source is needed to perform customer calibrations.…”
Section: Calibration Of Nist Gamma Sourcesmentioning
confidence: 99%
See 1 more Smart Citation
“…The calibration scheme for determining the dose rate has recently been detailed [ 8 ]. Irradiation geometries have been published previously [ 11 ].…”
Section: Methodsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…In addition, the BIPM, although it does not offer a high-dose service, took part at a lower dose level (1 kGy) to provide a direct link to the international reference for absorbed dose to water in 60 Co. To render the comparison more robust, two transfer dosimeters were selected for the comparison; the alanine/ESR dosimetry system of the NIST (Humphries et al, 1998) and that of the NPL (Sharpe and Sephton, 2000) (the previous CCRI comparison was conducted using the IAEA alanine as the transfer dosimeter).…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%